ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2003/378
Income Tax
Capital gains tax: main residence exemption - marriage breakdownFOI status: may be released
This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version. |
-
This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
If a dwelling acquired by a company on or after 20 September 1985 is transferred to a person following their marriage breakdown and roll-over was available to the company under Subdivision 126-A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), is the person entitled to a main residence exemption for the period that the dwelling was owned by the company?
Decision
No. Although the person is taken for the purposes of the main residence exemption in Subdivision 118-B of the ITAA 1997 to have owned the dwelling when it was owned by the company, subsection 118-180(2) of the ITAA 1997 specifies that the dwelling cannot be treated as the person's main residence during that period.
Facts
A company acquired a property (consisting of land and a dwelling) after 19 September 1985. The taxpayer and their spouse (who together owned all of the shares in the company) lived in the dwelling.
The taxpayer's marriage broke down. The taxpayer continued to live in the dwelling.
As a result of a court order under the Family Law Act 1975, the company transferred the property to the taxpayer. The taxpayer continued to live in the dwelling until they sold the property.
The taxpayer made a capital gain from the sale of the property.
Reasons for Decision
Subsection 118-180(1) of the ITAA 1997 treats a dwelling acquired by a taxpayer from a company or trustee as a result of marriage breakdown, as if it were owned by the taxpayer during the period when it was actually owned by the company or trustee if:
- •
- the dwelling was acquired by the company or trustee on or after 20 September 1985; and
- •
- marriage breakdown roll-over was available to the company or trustee under Subdivision 126-A of the ITAA 1997.
However, in these circumstances a dwelling cannot be treated as the taxpayer's main residence during the period when it was owned by the company or trustee, even if the taxpayer lived in the property when it was owned by the company or trustee (subsection 118-180(2) of the ITAA 1997).
As a result, the dwelling can only be treated as the taxpayer's main residence for the period from when the taxpayer actually owned the property.
This means that, on a subsequent disposal by the taxpayer, the dwelling will only qualify for a partial exemption in accordance with section 118-185 of the ITAA 1997, as the dwelling is not taken to be the taxpayer's main residence throughout the taxpayer's ownership period.
Date of decision: 15 November 2002Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2002
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
Subdivision 118-B
section 118-180
subsection 118-180(2)
section 118-185
Subdivision 126-A
The Act
Keywords
CGT roll-over relief
Company tax
CGT main residence exemption
CGT marriage breakdown
ISSN: 1445-2782
| Date: | Version: | |
| You are here → | 15 November 2002 | Original statement |
| 12 March 2010 | Archived |