ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2002/855 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

Deductibility of sun protection items by a non business taxpayer
FOI status: may be released
  • This ATO ID is superseded by Taxation Ruling TR 2003/16
    This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is a non business taxpayer entitled to a deduction under section 40-25 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ('ITAA 1997') for the cost of purchasing sunglasses and a hat where they are required to work outdoors for extended periods?

Decision

Yes. A non business taxpayer is entitled to a deduction under section 40-25 of the ITAA 1997 for the cost of purchasing sunglasses and a hat as the expenditure was incurred in gaining or producing their assessable income.

Facts

In order to earn their income the taxpayer is required to be outdoors and exposed to the sun for extended periods.

To protect themselves from the sun they wear sunglasses and a hat.

They purchased these items themselves and was not reimbursed by their employer.

Each item was purchased for less than $300.

Reasons for Decision

Section 40-25 of the ITAA 1997 allows a taxpayer to deduct an amount equal to the decline in value for an income year of a depreciating asset that they held for any time during that year.

A depreciating asset is an asset that has a limited effective life and can be expected to decline in value over the time it is used (subsection 40-30(1) of the ITAA 1997).

Sunglasses and a hat are each a depreciating asset for taxation purposes.

Subsection 40-80(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the decline in value of a depreciating asset will be the cost of the asset if the following applies:

the cost of the asset does not exceed $300
the asset is used predominantly for the production of assessable income (other than from a business)
the asset is not part of a set of assets the total cost of which exceeds $300
the total cost of the asset together with any substantially identical assets do not exceed $300.

The asset must be used predominantly for earning assessable income.

Following the decision in Morris and Ors v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 616; (2002) 50 ATR 104; 2002 ATC 4404 it is accepted that sunglasses and a hat protect the taxpayer from the risk of illness or injury as a result of exposure to the sun's glare therefore enabling the person to earn their assessable income and increase their productivity. There is a clear connection between the expenditure incurred and the earning of assessable income.

The taxpayer is entitled to a deduction for the decline in value which is equal to the cost of the sunglasses and hat under section 40-25 of the ITAA 1997. Apportionment of the expense under subsection 40-25(2) of the ITAA 1997 will be necessary if the sunglasses or hat are used partly for private purposes.

Date of decision:  16 August 2002

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2002

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 40-25
   subsection 40-25(2)
   subsection 40-30(1)
   subsection 40-80(2)

Case References:
Morris and Ors v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation
   [2002] FCA 616
   (2002) 50 ATR 104
   2002 ATC 4404

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2002/855

Keywords
Deductions & expenses
Work related expenses
Protective equipment

Business Line:  Small Business/Individual Taxpayers

Date of publication:  23 August 2002

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
  16 August 2002 Original statement
You are here 22 October 2004 Archived