Taxation Determination

TD 2005/19

Income tax: consolidation: does the phrase 'could be recognised in the joining entity's statement of financial position' in subsection 705-90(2) of Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 refer to the application of accounting policies consistent with the established accounting framework in preparing an entity's notional statement of financial position as at the joining time?

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

  • Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.
    This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

FOI status:

may be released

Preamble

The number, subject heading, date of effect and paragraph 1 of this document are a 'public ruling' for the purposes of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 and are legally binding on the Commissioner.

1. Yes. The phrase 'could be recognised in the joining entity's statement of financial position' refers to the relevant choices of accounting policies in working out the undistributed profits of the joining entity within the established accounting framework that includes accounting standards, statements of accounting concepts and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) in preparing an entity's notional statement of financial position.

2. This interpretation is consistent with the interpretation of the phrase 'can or must be recognised in the entity's statement of financial position' as used in subsection 705-70(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act (ITAA 1997).

Explanation

3. Subsection 705-90(2) provides:

First work out the undistributed profits of the joining entity at the joining time. These are the amounts that, in accordance with *accounting standards, or statements of accounting concepts made by the Australian Accounting Standards Board, are retained profits of the joining entity that could be recognised in the joining entity's statement of financial position if that statement were prepared as at the joining time.

4. Subsection 705-90(2) requires the determination of the undistributed profits of the joining entity at the joining time for the purposes of step 3 of the allocable cost amount (ACA) calculation. The meaning of the word 'could' in the phrase 'could be recognised in the joining entity's statement of financial position' is not defined in the income tax legislation. However, in the context of subsection 705-90(2) the phrase 'could be recognised' is interpreted to mean the same as the phrase 'can or must be recognised' as used in subsection 705-70(1) for reporting and non-reporting entities. Paragraph 19 of TR 2004/14 provides that the phrase 'can or must be recognised' refers to:

...relevant choice of accounting policies applied to accounting standards, statements of accounting concepts and other authoritative pronouncements of the AASB in preparing an entity's notional statement of financial position. Application of the accounting framework to the recognition and measurement of accounting liabilities will, in certain circumstances, allow joining entities a choice of recognising and measuring some liabilities. In those circumstances certain liabilities 'can' be recognised and measured at the joining time, but need not be recognised and measured at that time. However, all other liabilities 'must' be recognised and measured in accordance with applicable accounting standards, statements of accounting concepts and other authoritative pronouncements.

5. The relevant choices of accounting policies applied under the established accounting framework enables the joining entity to determine its undistributed profits. However, the use of the word 'could' in subsection 705-90(2) is not to be interpreted as if the joining entity has additional choices in applying and adopting different accounting policies in determining the undistributed profit amount which are not provided for under the accounting framework. The accounting framework is to be applied to the ACA process in a consistent manner in recognising and measuring retained profits at step 3. For instance, the accounting policy adopted, and adjustments made, in arriving at the retained profits amount at step 3 may affect, where relevant, the accounting liabilities at step 2.

6. The explanation section of TR 2004/14 provides further guidance about the established accounting framework applied in Australia in the context of recognising and measuring liabilities for step 2 of the ACA process. The accounting framework includes double entry accounting conventions, Australian accounting standards, statements of accounting concepts and authoritative pronouncements of the AASB together with other relevant pronouncements of professional bodies and other national accounting standard setting bodies that apply to the preparation of financial reports.

7. The phrases 'in accordance with accounting standards, or statements of accounting concepts made by the Australian Accounting Standards Board', 'recognised in the joining entity's statement of financial position' and 'at the joining time', are common to subsections 705-70(1) and 705-90(2).

8. In the context of subsection 705-70(1), paragraphs 8 to 15 of TR 2004/14 provides guidance as to the meaning of 'in accordance with accounting standards, or statements of accounting concepts made by the Australian Accounting Standards Board'. Paragraphs 19 and 20 of TR 2004/14 provide interpretative guidance as to the meaning of the phrase 'be recognised in the entity's statement of financial position'. This guidance is equally applicable in interpreting the phrase 'be recognised in the joining entity's statement of financial position if that statements were prepared as at the joining time' in subsection 705-90(2).

9. TD 2004/55 provides further guidance on the interpretation of 'retained profits' for the purposes of subsection 705-90(2).

Date of effect

10. This Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, it does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20).

Commissioner of Taxation
18 May 2005

previously issued as TD 2004/D79

References

ATO references:
NO 2004/15939

ISSN: 1038-8982

Related Rulings/Determinations:

TR 92/20
TR 2004/14
TD 2004/55

Subject References:
ACA
accounting framework
accounting standards
allocable cost amount
can or must
consolidation
could be recognised
notional statement of financial position
retained profits
step 3
undistributed profits

Legislative References:
TAA 1953 Pt IVAAA
ITAA 1997 705-70(1)
ITAA 1997 705-90(2)

TD 2005/19 history
  Date: Version: Change:
You are here 18 May 2005 Original ruling  
  17 November 2010 Withdrawn