ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2003/765 (Withdrawn)
income tax
Capital Allowances: cost to find a depreciating asset - first element of costFOI status: may be released
-
This ATO ID is withdrawn as it does not reflect amendments to section 40-180 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 which apply to expenditure incurred on or after 1 July 2005. Despite its withdrawal from the database, this ATO ID continues to be a precedential view in respect of expenditure incurred before 1 July 2005.This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
Status of this decision: Decision Withdrawn 26 May 2006
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Does capital expenditure incurred by the taxpayer in order to find a depreciating asset form part of the first element of cost of that asset under section 40-180 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?
Decision
No. Capital expenditure incurred to find a depreciating asset is not a cost to hold the asset and therefore does not form part of the first element of cost of the asset under section 40-180 of the ITAA 1997.
Facts
The taxpayer needed a vehicle to tow a trailer to carry equipment and materials used in the business. In the 2001-02 income year the taxpayer incurred expenditure on airfares to travel overseas, to look for an appropriate vehicle.
Before the taxpayer left Australia, internet research was conducted to determine the availability of the required type of vehicles at the intended overseas destination. At the time the taxpayer left Australia the taxpayer had not signed a contract for the acquisition of the vehicle. Nor did the taxpayer have a particular vehicle in mind.
The taxpayer's itinerary indicated that the first half of the trip was dedicated to searching for an appropriate vehicle. During this period the taxpayer incurred expenditure on car hire, fuel and meals.
The taxpayer ultimately succeeded in finding a suitable vehicle, which was subsequently purchased in an arm's length transaction. The remainder of the trip was spent organising fund transfers, collecting spare parts and arranging for the export of the vehicle and its transportation to Australia.
Reasons for Decision
Under section 40-175 of the ITAA 1997, the cost of a depreciating asset you hold consists of two elements, namely, first element of cost and second element of cost.
Under subsection 40-180(1) of the ITAA 1997, the first element of cost is worked out as at the time when you begin to hold the depreciating asset. Subsection 40-180(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the first element of cost is the amount specified in the last applicable item in the table in subsection 40-180(2) or, if no item in the table applies, the amount you are taken to have paid to hold the depreciating asset under section 40-185 of the ITAA 1997.
No item in the table in subsection 40-180(2) of the ITAA 1997 applies.
Paragraph 40-185(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 provides that you are taken to have paid an amount to hold a depreciating asset in the circumstances specified in the table in subsection 40-185(1) of the ITAA 1997. Item 1 of the table specifies that if you pay an amount, the amount you are taken to have paid to hold a depreciating asset is the amount so paid.
An amount is paid to hold an asset if it is for, or incidental to, the acquisition, construction or creation of the asset. What is incidental to the acquisition, construction or creation of an asset is a question of fact in each case.
The taxpayer was not the holder of the asset when the trip was undertaken. It was uncertain that a suitable vehicle would be found. The payments for airfares, car hire, fuel and meals were not made to hold a depreciating asset. The payments were made to put the taxpayer in a position where a suitable vehicle might potentially be located. The expenditure was not for, or incidental, to the acquisition of the asset. The expenditure lacks a sufficiently close connection with the acquisition of the asset to be regarded as incidental to its acquisition.
The expenditure incurred on airfares, car hire, fuel and meals are not amounts the taxpayer is taken to have paid to hold the vehicle for the purposes of section 40-185 of the ITAA 1997. These amounts do not form part of the first element of cost under section 40-180 of the ITAA 1997.
Date of decision: 7 August 2003Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2002
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
Paragraph 40-185(1) (b)
Subsection 40-180(2)
Section 40-175
Section 40-180
Section 40-185
ATO ID 2002/920
ATO ID 2002/884
ATO ID 2003/514
Keywords
Cost of a depreciating asset
First element of cost
Second element of cost
Economic benefit for a depreciating asset
Capital Allowances CoE
Uniform capital allowances system
ISSN: 1445-2782
| Date: | Version: | |
| 7 August 2003 | Original statement | |
| You are here → | 26 May 2006 | Archived |