Taxation Determination
TD 94/6
Income tax: abnormal income of artists, sportspersons etc: can eligible taxable income be a negative amount for the purposes of Division 16A of Part III of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 , so that a loss can be recognised from eligible activities and used to reduce average eligible taxable income?
This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version. |
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.This ruling contains references to repealed provisions, some of which may have been rewritten. The ruling still has effect. Paragraph 32 in TR 2006/10 provides further guidance on the status and binding effect of public rulings where the law has been repealed or repealed and rewritten. The legislative references at the end of the ruling indicate the repealed provisions and, where applicable, the rewritten provisions.This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
FOI status:
may be releasedFOI number: I 1216912This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20). |
1. No. The definition of 'eligible taxable income' in section 158J does not envisage a loss. Eligible taxable income of a taxpayer is defined as '....the amount (if any) remaining after deducting from eligible assessable income....' any of those deductions specifically mentioned. The words 'if any' suggest that there may be no income in some cases. This implies that eligible taxable income cannot be a negative amount.
2. Since eligible taxable income cannot be a negative amount, the amount of loss in a relevant year for the purposes of determining the average eligible taxable income in section 158K cannot also be negative.
The loss is treated as a nil amount.
Example:
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Total $ $ $ $ $ $ Eligible Assessable Income A 8000 6000 9000 8000 5000 36000 LESS Related Deductions B 2000 7000 12000 2000 6000 29000 A-B = C 6000 (1000) (3000) 6000 (1000) 7000 ELIGIBLE TAXABLE INCOME D 6000 NIL NIL 6000 NIL 12000 Ineligible Assessable Income E 5000 4000 10000 3000 7000 29000 LESS Deductions F - 500 1000 - - 1500 INELIGIBLE TAXABLE INCOME E-F=G 5000 3500 9000 3000 7000 27500 TAXABLE INCOME C+G=H 11000 2500 6000 9000 6000 34500
The taxpayer is assumed to be a resident throughout the above years of income. For the 1989, 1990 and 1992 years eligible taxable income, being a negative amount (row C), is to be treated as 'nil' for Division 16A purposes (row D). The average eligible taxable income in accordance with section 158K, for the 1992 year, would be $3000 (ie. 1/4 of the total eligible taxable incomes of the preceding four years of income, that is, Total column row D).
Commissioner of Taxation
20/1/94
Previously issued as Draft TD 93/D271
References
ATO references:
NO MPS 2002/1
Subject References:
abnormal income;
average eligible taxable income;
eligible taxable income
Legislative References:
ITAA Pt III Div 16A;
ITAA 158J
Date: | Version: | Change: | |
20 January 1994 | Original ruling | ||
You are here | 29 November 2006 | Original ruling + note | Repeal provision note |
27 February 2008 | Withdrawn |