ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/1155 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

Assessability of an Eligible Termination Payment received by a resident of Papua New Guinea
FOI status: may be released
  • This ATO ID is withdrawn from 1 July 2007 as the position stated in the ATO ID is not current due to the superannuation law changes
    This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is the taxpayer, a resident individual of Papua New Guinea for tax purposes, in receipt of an eligible termination payment (ETP) from a complying superannuation fund, liable to pay tax on this income in Australia under subsection 6-5(3) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Decision

Yes. The taxpayer, a resident individual of Papua New Guinea in receipt of an ETP from a complying superannuation fund, is liable to pay tax on this income under subsection 6-5(3) of the ITAA 1997.

Facts

The taxpayer is a resident of Papua New Guinea for income tax purposes.

The taxpayer receives an ETP from a complying superannuation fund resident in Australia.

Reasons for Decision

Section 6-10 of the ITAA 1997 provides that a taxpayer's assessable income includes statutory income amounts that are not ordinary income but are included in assessable income by another provision. Subsection 6-10(5) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the assessable income of a non-resident taxpayer includes statutory income from all Australian sources and other statutory income that a provision includes on some basis other than having an Australian source.

Subsection 6-10(2) of the ITAA 1997 defines statutory income by referring to amounts included in assessable income by provisions about assessable income and section 10-5 of the ITAA 1997 lists those provisions about assessable income.

Included in this list are eligible termination payments dealt with under sections 27A to 27H of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).

The taxpayer is a resident individual of Papua New Guinea, a country with which Australia has entered into a double tax agreement. Therefore, the double tax agreement between Australia and Papua New Guinea (the Papua New Guinea Agreement) contained in Schedule 29 to the International Tax Agreements Act 1953 (the Agreements Act) must be considered in determining whether the ETP received by the taxpayer is taxable in Australia.

Section 11T of the Agreements Act gives the Papua New Guinea Agreement the force of law in Australia.

Subsection 4(1) of the Agreements Act provides that the ITAA 1936 and the ITAA 1997 must be read as one with the Agreements Act.

Article 15 of the Papua New Guinea Agreement deals with dependant personal services and provides that salaries, wages and other similar remuneration including payments made in consequence of the termination of employment derived by a resident of Papua New Guinea in respect of an employment shall be taxable only in Papua New Guinea unless the employment is exercised in Australia. However, if the employment or services are performed in Australia, such remuneration may also be taxed in Australia.

An ETP, being a capital amount paid from a complying superannuation fund upon retirement is not considered to be 'salary, wages' or 'other similar remuneration' and therefore does not come within the scope of Article 15 of the Papua New Guinea Agreement.

Article 18 of the Papua New Guinea Agreement deals with pensions and annuities. Article 18(1) of the Papua New Guinea Agreement provides that pensions including government pensions and annuities paid to an individual who is a resident of Papua New Guinea shall be taxable only in Papua New Guinea.

Article 18(2) of the Papua New Guinea Agreement defines annuities to mean periodic payments.

An ETP is not a periodic payment and is therefore not within the scope of Article 18 of the Papua New Guinea Agreement.

Therefore the ETP received by the taxpayer is assessable under sections 27A to 27H of the ITAA 1936 as statutory income from an Australian source and forms part of the taxpayer's assessable income under subsection 6-10(5) of the ITAA 1997.

Date of decision:  1 October 2003

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2003

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   section 27A
   section 27H

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   subsection 6-5(3)
   section 6-10
   subsection 6-10(2)
   subsection 6-10(5)
   section 10-5

International Tax Agreements Act 1953
   subsection 4(1)
   section 11T
   Schedule 29
   Schedule 29, Article 15
   Schedule 29, Article 18
   Schedule 29, Article 18(1)
   Schedule 29, Article 18(2)

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Taxation Ruling IT 2168

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2002/638

Keywords
Double tax agreements
Eligible termination payments
Non-resident individuals
Papua New Guinea
Superannuation pensions

Business Line:  Public Groups and International

Date of publication:  19 December 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
  1 October 2003 Original statement
You are here 26 October 2007 Archived