ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2001/712 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

Capital Gains Tax: CGT small business relief: small business CGT affiliate
FOI status: may be released
  • This ATO ID is withdrawn from the database as it is a simple restatement of the law and does not contain an interpretative decision.
    This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is a company owned and directed by the taxpayer's children the taxpayer's small business CGT affiliate for the purposes of the small business CGT concessions in Division 152 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Decision

Yes. The company will be the taxpayer's small business CGT affiliate. As the taxpayer has actively participated in their children's farming business, the company could reasonably be expected to act in concert with the taxpayer in accordance with section 152-25 of the ITAA 1997.

Facts

The taxpayer and their spouse were partners in a partnership which acquired farmland in 1986. They formulated a succession plan to enable their children to take over the farming operations. In accordance with the plan, a new company was formed which was owned and directed by the taxpayer's children ('the company'). The company then acquired the stock and plant and entered into a lease agreement (which imposed certain restrictions on their farming activities) for use of the farmland.

With the company owning the stock and plant of the farming business the children could make their own decisions relating to the farm program. The taxpayer, however, retained financial control through provision of working capital and the use of the farmland via the lease agreement. The children consult with the taxpayer before making decisions concerning the farming business. The taxpayer has continued to work unpaid on the farm performing duties such as driving machinery, machinery maintenance, fencing, and general farm work.

Reasons for Decision

One of the basic conditions for the small business CGT concessions is that the active asset test must be satisfied (section 152-10 of the ITAA 1997). Amongst other things, an asset will be an active asset if it is used or held ready for use in the course of carrying on a business by a small business CGT affiliate (subparagraph 152-40(1)(c)(i) of the ITAA 1997).

The term 'small business CGT affiliate' is defined in section 152-25 of the ITAA 1997. A person is a small business CGT affiliate of a taxpayer if the person acts, or could reasonably be expected to act in accordance with the taxpayer's directions or wishes, or in concert with the taxpayer. Section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997 defines 'person' to include a company.

In this case the farmland is held by the taxpayer for use in the farming business conducted by the company. The company's activities are limited by the finance that the taxpayer provides and are also constrained by the clauses in the lease agreement. In addition the taxpayer continues to work on the farm for no remuneration and the children refer to the taxpayer for advice on matters concerning the running of the farming business.

As the taxpayer is actively involved in the business and is consulted in business decisions it is considered that the company acts or could reasonably be expected to act in concert with the taxpayer. Therefore the company owned and directed by the taxpayer's children is considered to be the taxpayer's small business CGT affiliate.

The following paragraph was deleted from the Reasons for Decision as it contained general statements which were not relied on in making the decision in this ATO ID.
Extensions to the small business CGT concessions were outlined in the Treasurer's Press Release No. 76 of 1998. The Press Release explains the additional situations that the CGT small business concessions should now apply to. It was the intention of the Government at the time of introducing these additional measures that the concessions were to apply to small businesses where a non-operating entity held some of the business assets providing these assets were used actively in a business.

Date of decision:  28 September 2001

Year of income:  Year ending 30 June 2002

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 152-10
   section 152-25
   section 152-40
   subparagraph 152-40(1)(c)(i)
   section 995-1

Other References:
Treasurer's Press Release No. 76 of 1998.

Keywords
Capital gains
CGT small business relief
Basic conditions for relief
Small Business CGT affiliate

Business Line:  Centres of expertise capital gains tax

Date of publication:  30 November 2001

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
  28 September 2001 Original statement
You are here 5 March 2010 Archived