ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2002/1002 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

• This ATO ID is withdrawn. Guidance on the issue contained in this ATO ID can be found in Taxation Determination TD 94/39.
  This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

Issue

Is a taxpayer assessable under section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) on an amount representing the value of work in progress where there is no entitlement to payment until after completion of a project?

Decision

No. A taxpayer is not assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 on an amount representing the value of work in progress where there is no entitlement to payment until after completion of a project.

Facts

The taxpayer tenders for projects and is given a purchase order when successful.

The purchase order states that an invoice can only be sent after the services have been completed.

The length of projects varies between a few days up to 4 months.

There are no progress payments and the taxpayer is only entitled to receive payment once the projects are completed.

The taxpayer returns their income on an accruals basis.

Reasons for Decision

Subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the assessable income of a resident taxpayer includes ordinary income derived directly or indirectly from all sources during the income year.

The issue is whether the value of the work in progress is income that has been derived by the taxpayer.

In Henderson v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1970) 119 CLR 612; 70 ATC 4016; (1970) 1 ATR 596 Windeyer J stated:

'Nevertheless, I think that services rendered for fees do not result in income derived within the meaning of the Act until the fees are either paid or payable. This, of course, may be before an account for payment is rendered.... But when a professional man is, according to the terms of his engagement, not to be paid until his task is completed, I do not think he can be said to have earned anything by that task until then.'

This view is accepted by the Commissioner in Taxation Ruling IT 2450 and Taxation Determination TD 94/39 in relation to long-term construction contracts. Paragraph 5 of TD 94/39 states:

'However, where a taxpayer enters into an arm's length contract under which the taxpayer is not entitled to receive any payment until completion of the contract, the income from that contract is not derived in terms of section 25(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 until the year in which the contract is completed: see H.W. Coyle Limited v. C of IR (NZ) 80 ATC 6012 per Holland J. at 6022...'

The principles set out in the above mentioned cases reflect the law as it applies generally to taxpayers returning their income on an accruals basis.

The taxpayer has entered into arm's length transactions which allow an invoice to be presented only after completion of a project.

As such, no amount is included in the taxpayer's assessable income under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 until the completion of the specific project.

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2002

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 6-5
   subsection 6-5(2)

Case References:
Henderson v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation
   (1970) 119 CLR 612
   (1970) 70 ATC 4016
   1 ATR 596

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Taxation Ruling IT 2450
Taxation Determination TD 94/39

Keywords
Work in progress
Long term transactions
Accrual basis accounting

Business Line:  Private Groups and High Wealth Individuals

Date of publication:  30 October 2002

ISSN: 1445-2782