ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2002/555 (Withdrawn)
Income Tax
Balancing Adjustment Roll-Over Relief for pre-CGT 'loss' assetsFOI status: may be released
-
This ATO ID is withdrawn as it does not reflect the ATO view due to legislative changes contained in the New Business Tax System (Consolidation) Act (No. 1) 2002.This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Is rollover relief available under Subdivision 41-A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ('ITAA 1997') where Company A disposes of a unit of plant, acquired before 20 September 1985, to Company B, which is part of the same wholly owned group and the disposal gives rise to a balancing adjustment deduction under section 42-195 of the ITAA 1997?
Decision
No. The roll-over relief available under Subdivision 41-A of the ITAA 1997 is not available for plant that was acquired before 20 September 1985 in respect of disposals within the same wholly owned group because of the application of Subdivision 170-D of the ITAA 1997.
Facts
Company A is a member of a wholly-owned group of Australian resident companies that also includes Company B. Company A has a unit of plant that it acquired before 20 September 1985. It disposes of that unit of plant to company B during the income year ended 30 June 2001. The market value of the unit of plant at the time of disposal is $30,000. The undeducted cost of the unit at the time of sale was $50,000. As a result of the disposal, Company A becomes entitled, under section 42-195 of the ITAA 1997, to a deduction of $20,000.
Reasons for Decision
Subdivision 41-A of the ITAA 1997 provides roll-over relief for a disposal of plant between Australian resident companies within the same wholly-owned group where :
- •
- same asset roll-over is available under Subdivision 126-B of the ITAA 1997 and
- •
- both companies choose to obtain it.
For plant acquired before 20 September 1985 same asset roll-over is available under subparagraph 126-55(1)(a)(ii) of the ITAA 1997
However, section 41-14 of the ITAA 1997 provides that roll-over relief under Subdivision 41-A of the ITAA 1997 does not apply in respect of a disposal where Subdivision 170-D of the ITAA 1997 applies.
Section 170-255 of the ITAA 1997 contains the conditions for the application of that Subdivision. The conditions relevant to the facts provided are:
- •
- There is an event (the deferral event) involving a company (the originating company), and another entity (ie. Company B) as per paragraph 170-255(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997.
- •
- The deferral event would have resulted in the originating company (Company A) becoming entitled to a deduction in respect of the disposal of a CGT asset as per subparagraph 170-255(1)(b)(ii) of the ITAA 1997.
- •
- The originating company is a resident at the time of the deferral event.
- •
- At the time of the deferral event, the originating company is a member of a linked group and the other entity is also a member of that linked group as per subparagraph 170-255(1)(e)(i) of the ITAA 1997.
Applying these conditions to the facts:-
- (a)
- the disposal of the item of plant is a deferral event involving Company A (the originating company) and Company B (another entity) ;
- (b)
- this deferral event has resulted in the Company A becoming entitled to a deduction (a balancing adjustment deduction of $20,000) in respect of the disposal of a CGT asset (the item of plant);
- (c)
- Company A is a resident at the time of the deferral event; and
- (d)
- at the time of the deferral event, Company A and Company B are members of the same wholly owned group of companies. Two members of a wholly-owned company group would fall within the definition of "linked group" under section 170-260 of the ITAA 1997.
Accordingly, the conditions for application of Subdivision 170-D of the ITAA 1997 have been met in these circumstances. Therefore roll-over relief for a disposal of plant under Subdivision 41-A of the ITAA 1997 is not available, notwithstanding that same asset rollover is available under Subdivision 126-B of the ITAA 1997.
Date of decision: 11 March 2002Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2001
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
Subdivision 41-A
section 41-14
section 41-20
paragraph 41-20(1)(c)
section 42-195
subsection 126-55(1)
Subdivision 170-D
section 170-255
subparagraph 170-255(1)(b)(ii)
subparagraph 170-255(1)(e)(i)
section 170-260
Keywords
Group company transfers
Group company loss transfers
Balancing adjustment rollover relief
Capital Allowances CoE
Additional balancing adjustment amount
Balancing adjustment event
Balancing adjustment offset
Disposal of plant
ISSN: 1445-2782
| Date: | Version: | |
| 11 March 2002 | Original statement | |
| You are here | 3 November 2006 | Archived |