ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2002/558 (Withdrawn)

Superannuation

Superannuation retirement and employment termination: Superannuation Pension Rebate. Taxpayer discharged from employment on medical grounds
FOI status: may be released
  • This ATO ID is withdrawn as it is a simple restatement of the law and does not contain an interpretative decision.
    This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is the taxpayer entitled to a rebate under section 159SM of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) on his pension?

Decision

No, the taxpayer is not entitled to a rebate under section 159SM of the ITAA 1936.

Facts

The taxpayer obtained two medical reports to support his discharge on medical grounds from service as a police officer.

The taxpayer was medically discharged, aged less than 55, and began to receive a pension from the employer sponsored superannuation scheme.

The taxpayer subsequently obtained additional medical certificates.

Reasons for Decision

In order to determine if the taxpayer is entitled to a rebate it is necessary to consider the meaning of a number of the terms used in section 159SM of the ITAA 1936.

Pension income in a year of income must include a 'rebatable 27H amount' for any rebate entitlement to arise under section 159SM of the ITAA 1936.

'Rebatable 27H amount' is defined in subsection 159SJ(1) of the ITAA 1936 as:

'in relation to a rebatable ETP annuity or a rebatable superannuation pension and in relation to a year of income, means:

(a)
if:

(i)
the 55th birthday of the recipient of the annuity or pension occurred before the year of income; or
(ii)
the annuity or pension is a death or disability annuity/pension for the recipient;

an amount included in assessable income under section 27H in respect of the annuity or pension; or
(b)
in any other case - so much (if any) of an amount included in assessable income under section 27H in respect of the annuity or pension made on or after the recipient's 55th birthday;'

As the taxpayer, in this case, is under the age of 55 the issue raised by the applicant is if the pension is a disability pension. Subsection 159SJ(1) of the ITAA 1936 defines a disability pension as:

'in relation to a person, means:

(a)
...
(b)
an annuity or superannuation pension provided to the person:

(i)
...
(ii)
if the first payment date for the annuity or superannuation pension is on or after 1 July 1994 - in the event of the disability of the person, where 2 legally qualified medical practitioners have certified that the disability is likely to result in the person being unable ever to be employed in a capacity for which the person is reasonably qualified because of education, training or experience;'

Two medical practitioners must have certified the disability is likely to result in the taxpayer being unable ever to be employed in a capacity for which the taxpayer is reasonably qualified because of education, training or experience.

Under the rules of the relevant superannuation scheme a person is entitled to a benefit if the trustee certifies they are incapable of performing the duties of their office after considering medical advice. Therefore, a person can be entitled to an invalidity benefit from the scheme without satisfying the requirements of a disability pension in subsection 159SJ(1) of the ITAA 1936.

The applicant has provided copies of two medical reports obtained in support of his medical discharge. Both reports state the taxpayer is not fit for normal police duties without any comment on his ability to undertake other appropriate employment. These reports do not satisfy the requirements for a disability pension under subsection 159SJ(1) of the ITAA 1936.

This is supported by the fact the trustee of the fund has advised the pension is not eligible for a rebate for Reasonable Benefit Limit (RBL) purposes. It should be noted the definition of a 'disability superannuation pension' in the RBL provisions contains the same requirements as in subsection 159SJ(1) of the ITAA 1936.

The applicant has subsequently provided additional medical certificates.

The additional certificates provided by the applicant still do not satisfy the requirements for the pension to be regarded as a disability pension for the purposes of subsection 159SJ(1) of the ITAA 1936.

Date of decision:  11 February 2002

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2000

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   Section 159SJ
   Section 159SM

Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906
   Section 7
   Section 8

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2002/346

Keywords
Superannuation pension rebates
Disability superannuation pensions
ETP invalidity payments

Business Line:  Superannuation

Date of publication:  31 May 2002

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
  11 February 2002 Original statement
You are here 26 June 2009 Archived