ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/222

Income Tax

Repairs: replacement of kitchen cupboards in a rental property
FOI status: may be released

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Can the taxpayer deduct expenditure on the replacement of kitchen cupboards installed in a rental property as repairs under section 25-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Decision

No. The taxpayer cannot deduct the expenditure as repairs under section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997 because it is capital in nature.

Facts

The taxpayer has owned and rented a residential property for many years. While the property was tenanted, the taxpayer replaced the old kitchen fittings, including the cupboards. The old cupboards had deteriorated through water damage and wear and tear.

The new fittings are of a similar size, design and quality as the originals. The new cupboards are of the same type and standard of material (or the modern equivalent of that material) as the old ones. The layout and design of the kitchen did not alter substantially from that of the original. The differences are:

the old sink was replaced with a smaller sink and, as a consequence, provided more bench top space; and
a removable cupboard replaced the space previously available for a dishwasher.

Reasons for Decision

Broadly speaking, section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997 allows a deduction for expenditure on repairs to income producing premises and depreciating assets provided the expenditure is not capital in nature.

On the facts provided, it is accepted that the replacement of the cupboards did not result in a significant improvement in the efficiency or function of the kitchen.

However, if the cupboards are a separately identifiable thing representing an entirety in themselves and the expenditure on replacing the kitchen cupboards results in an improvement or a renewal or reconstruction of an entirety, the expenditure is not a repair but is capital in nature (Taxation Ruling TR 97/23).

In Lindsay v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1961) 106 CLR 377; [1961] HCA 93, the High Court (Kitto J) held that expenditure incurred to renew a slipway was a renewal of an entirety and was not deductible as a repair under section 53 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (which was rewritten as section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997). This conclusion was drawn on the basis that his Honour considered the slipway to be a separately identifiable capital item, maintaining its own function. Substantially the whole of the old slipway had been demolished and replaced by a new slipway, comprising all new components and was a renewal of a separately identifiable item and not a repair.

These principles equally apply here. The kitchen cupboards are separately identifiable capital items with their own function and are, therefore, an entirety in themselves. Their replacement is a renewal of an entirety and the expenditure is not deductible as a repair under section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997. The expenditure is capital in nature.

Date of decision:  24 December 2002

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2002

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   section 53

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 25-10

Case References:
Lindsay v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
   (1961) 106 CLR 377
   [1961] HCA 93

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Taxation Ruling TR 97/23

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2003/223

Keywords
Repairs in entirety
Rental property

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  3153772; 1-5LSDY7S; 1-B445R2A

Business Line:  Private Groups and High Wealth Individuals

Date of publication:  4 April 2003
Date reviewed:  29 March 2017

ISSN: 1445-2782