ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/264 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

Deferred capital loss or deduction - asset transferred to a non-resident company
FOI status: may be released
  • This ATO ID is withdrawn from the database as it is a simple restatement of the law and does not contain an interpretative decision.
    This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Will a capital loss made on the disposal of a CGT asset by a resident company to a non-resident company that is a member of the same 'linked group' be disregarded by the operation of Subdivision 170-D of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) if the asset does not have 'the necessary connection with Australia'?

Decision

Yes. Subdivision 170-D of the ITAA 1997 will apply in accordance with section 170-255 of the ITAA 1997.

Facts

Company A is a resident of Australia for taxation purposes.

Company S is a 100% owned subsidiary of Company A and is a non-resident of Australia for taxation purposes.

Company N is 60% owned by Company A and is also a non-resident of Australia for taxation purposes. The other 40% is owned by otherwise unrelated persons.

Company A disposed of a 20% shareholding in Company N to Company S which resulted in CGT event A1 happening for the purposes of subsection 104-10(1) of the ITAA 1997.

The capital proceeds were less than the share's reduced cost base at the time of the CGT event and Company A made a capital loss in accordance with subsection 104-10(4) of the ITAA 1997.

Reasons for Decision

Subsection 170-255(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that Subdivision 170-D of the ITAA 1997 will apply if:

(a)
an event (the deferral event ) happens involving a company (the originating company ) and another entity; and
(b)
one or more of the following apply:

(i)
the deferral event is a *CGT event that would have resulted in the originating company making a *capital loss (except a capital loss that would be disregarded under a provision of this Act other than this Subdivision);
(ii)
...;
(iii)
...; and

(c)
if subparagraph (b)(i) applies -- the CGT event is one of the following:

(i)
CGT events A1 and B1 (a disposal case );
(ii)
CGT events D1, D2, D3 and F1 (a creation case ); and

(d)
one of the following applies:

(i)
the originating company is a resident at the time of the deferral event;
(ii)
...;
(iii)
...;
(iv)
...;
(v)
...; and

(e)
at the time of the deferral event, the originating company is a member of a *linked group and one of the following applies:

(i)
the other entity is a company that is not a connected entity of the originating company and is a member of that linked group;
(ii)
...;
(iii)
...'

* denotes a term defined in section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997.

For Subdivision 170-D of the ITAA 1997 to apply, paragraphs 170-255(1)(a) to (e) of the ITAA 1997 must be met.

A deferral event happened involving the disposal by Company A of its shares in Company N to Company S the purposes of paragraph 170-255(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997.

The deferral event was a CGT event that would have resulted in Company A making a capital loss for the purposes of subparagraph 170-255(1)(b)(i) of the ITAA 1997.

The CGT event is CGT event A1 for the purposes of subparagraph 170-255(1)(c)(i) of the ITAA 1997.

Company A was a resident at the time of the deferral event for the purposes of subparagraph 170-255(1)(d)(i) of the ITAA 1997.

Company A and Company S were linked at the time of the CGT event for the purposes of subsection 170-260(2) of the ITAA 1997.

At the time of the deferral event, Company A was a member of a linked group and Company S was not a connected entity of company A but was a member of that linked group for the purposes of subparagraph 170-255(1)(e)(i) of the ITAA 1997.

As each of paragraphs 170-255(1)(a) to (e) of the ITAA 1997 are satisfied then section 170-270 of Subdivision 170-D of the ITAA 1997 applies to disregard the capital loss.

In applying subsection 170-255(1) of the ITAA 1997 it was not necessary to consider any of the provisions in that subsection that require the CGT asset to have 'the necessary connection with Australia'.

Date of decision:  19 November 2002

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2002

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   subsection 104-10(1)
   subsection 104-10(4)
   section 136-10
   section 136-25
   Subdivision 170-D
   section 170-255
   subsection 170-255(1)
   paragraph 170-255(1)(a)
   paragraph 170-255(1)(b)
   subparagraph 170-255(1)(b)(i)
   paragraph 170-255(1)(c)
   subparagraph 170-255(1)(c)(i)
   paragraph 170-255(1)(d)
   subparagraph 170-255(1)(d)(i)
   paragraph 170-255(1)(e)
   subparagraph 170-255(1)(e)(i)
   subsection 170-260(1)
   subsection 170-260(2)

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2003/265
ATO ID 2003/266
ATO ID 2003/267

Keywords
Capital gains tax
Capital losses
CGT asset with the necessary connection with Australia
Losses and capital gains tax CoE
Non resident companies

Business Line:  Losses and CGT Centre of Expertise

Date of publication:  29 April 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
  19 November 2002 Original statement
You are here 12 September 2008 Archived