ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/361

Income Tax

Capital gains tax: cost base - consultant's fees
FOI status: may be released

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Will the fees paid by a taxpayer to a consultant to find and recommend a suitable rental property which is later purchased by the taxpayer form part of the second element of the cost base of the property under subsection 110-25(3) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Decision

Yes. The fees paid by a taxpayer to a consultant to find and recommend a suitable rental property which is later purchased by the taxpayer will form part of the second element of the cost base of the property under subsection 110-25(3) of the ITAA 1997. The consultant's fees are considered to be incidental costs incurred, to acquire the rental property, under subsections 110-35(1) and 110-35(2) of the ITAA 1997.

Facts

The taxpayer engaged a consultant to find a suitable rental property in the 1999-2000 income year and incurred consultancy fees.

Based on the consultant's recommendation, the taxpayer purchased the rental property a few months later.

The taxpayer disposed of the rental property in the 2001-02 income year and made a capital gain.

The taxpayer included the consultant's fees paid as part of the cost base of the rental property.

Reasons for Decision

The second element of the cost base of a CGT asset includes the incidental costs that the taxpayer incurs in acquiring the asset or which relate to a CGT event that happens in relation to the asset: subsections 110-25(3) and 110-35(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Incidental costs that can be included in the cost base of a CGT asset are set out in section 110-35 of the ITAA 1997. Subsection 110-35(2) of the ITAA 1997 lists remuneration for the services of a consultant as an incidental cost.

As the taxpayer has incurred the consultant's fees in relation to the acquisition of the rental property, these fees have been incurred to acquire the CGT asset and will form part of the second element of the cost base of the rental property in accordance with subsection 110-25(3) of the ITAA 1997.

Date of decision:  6 May 2003

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2002

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 110-25
   subsection 110-25(3)
   section 110-35
   subsection 110-35(1)
   subsection 110-35(2)

Keywords
Capital gains tax
CGT assets
CGT cost base

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  3557550

Business Line:  Public Groups and International

Date of publication:  15 May 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782