ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/486

Income Tax

Selective capital reduction: application of section 45B
FOI status: may be released

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Will section 45B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) apply to treat as a dividend any part of the selective reduction of capital undertaken to restructure the shareholdings in a company?

Decision

No. Section 45B of the ITAA 1936 will not apply to treat any part of the selective capital reduction as a dividend. Although there is a scheme that provides a capital benefit to a person, and a person obtains a tax benefit under the scheme, it cannot be concluded that any person who enters into or carries out the proposed selective capital reduction does so for a more than incidental purpose of enabling a taxpayer to obtain a tax benefit.

Facts

All the dividend-bearing shares in a company resident in Australia are held in equal proportion by a number of 'principals' or their associated entities. The principals are also employed by the company.

The principals have reached agreement with an unrelated company to acquire their shares in the company. The principals have recognised that there are differences in the price considered appropriate for the sale of their respective shares in the company. To facilitate the takeover, a restructuring of the shareholdings is needed to even out differences in the value of the shares. In order to alter their shareholdings in the agreed proportions, the principals agreed to restructure their shareholdings through a selective capital reduction.

The shareholders' equity in the company currently consists entirely of capital subscribed either as paid-up capital or share premium. All profits generated by the company have been distributed as dividends to the shareholders.

Distributions to shareholders whose shares are cancelled will consist of amounts equal to the amount paid-up together with any former share premium contributed at the time of subscription for the shares to be cancelled.

Reasons for Decision

A purpose of section 45B of the ITAA 1936 is to ensure that amounts paid in substitution for dividends are treated as unfrankable dividends for income tax purposes. Section 45B of the ITAA 1936 applies if there is a 'scheme' under which:

a person is 'provided with a capital benefit'; and
a person (whether receiving the capital benefit or not) 'obtains a tax benefit'; and
having regard to the 'relevant circumstances' of the scheme, it would be concluded that the person, or one of the persons, who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme did so for a purpose (whether or not the dominant purpose but not including an incidental purpose) of enabling a taxpayer to 'obtain a tax benefit'.

The selective capital reduction is a 'scheme' contemplated by section 45B of the ITAA 1936.

To the extent the amount paid to the shareholders whose shares are cancelled under the selective capital reduction is not a dividend, it will be a distribution of share capital. That distribution would constitute the 'provision of a capital benefit' to the shareholders.

The shares to be cancelled were all acquired after 19 September 1985. As capital gains tax treatment ordinarily results in less tax payable than an equivalent distribution consisting of dividend income, the requirement that there must be a person who would 'obtain a tax benefit' under the scheme would be satisfied.

It cannot be concluded that any person who enters into or carries out this selective capital reduction does so for a more than incidental purpose of enabling a taxpayer to 'obtain a tax benefit' having regard to:

the distribution not being attributable to profits of the company, as accumulated profits were distributed prior to the capital reduction;
the pattern of dividend distributions by the company, whereby annual profits were consistently distributed as dividends;
the cost base of the cancelled shares not being substantially less than the value of the applicable capital benefit;
the restructuring of the equity interests of the principals that is intended by the selective capital reduction; and
the intended subsequent sale of all the shares in the company to an unrelated company.

Date of decision:  9 December 2002

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2003

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   Section 45B

Keywords
Capital benefit
Capital reductions
Deemed dividends
Return of capital on shares

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  3580151

Business Line:  Public Groups and International

Date of publication:  27 June 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782