ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2005/59

Income Tax

Consolidation: value and loss donor rules - a loss can only be taken into account for the value donor rule or loss donor rule but not both
FOI status: may be released
  • This ATO ID has been amended to improve clarity.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Can a choice be made by the transferee, under subsection 707-327(4) of the Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997 (IT(TP)A), to 'donate' a loss where:

the loss is in a bundle of losses that is transferred from a company (the real loss-maker) to the transferee, under Subdivision 707-A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997);
the transferee makes a choice, under subsection 707-325(5) of the IT(TP)A, to 'donate' modified market value of another company (the value donor) to the real loss-maker, for the purposes of determining the available fraction for the bundle of losses;
the loss is included in the 'total of real loss-maker's Division 170 losses in bundle' (as defined in subsection 707-325(4) of the IT(TP)A) in an application of section 707-325 of the IT(TP)A in respect of the value donor; and
the transferee also chooses, under subsection 707-325(5) of the IT(TP)A, to 'donate' modified market value of the real loss-maker to another (third) company whose losses have also been transferred to the transferee under Subdivision 707-A of the ITAA 1997?

Decision

No. Subsection 707-327(6) of the IT(TP)A prevents the transferee from making a choice, under subsection 707-327(4) of the IT(TP)A, to treat the loss as if it was included in another bundle of losses.

Facts

Head Co forms a consolidated group before 1 July 2004. The members of the consolidated group at the time the group forms are Head Co, Donor Co and Sub Co. Head Co and Donor Co were members of the same wholly-owned group prior to 1 July 2000 and Sub Co became a member of the wholly-owned group during the 2000-01 income year.

At the time the group forms, tax losses are transferred, under Subdivision 707-A of the ITAA 1997, from Head Co and Sub Co to Head Co, as the head company of the consolidated group. The respective income years for which each of these tax losses were originally incurred are shown in the diagram.

All of the conditions in section 707-325 of the IT(TP)A are satisfied for Donor Co to be a value donor in respect of Head Co and for Head Co to be a value donor in respect of Sub Co. In working out the available fractions for 'Bundle Head Co' and 'Bundle Sub Co', the following 'donations' of value are made:

modified market value is added from Donor Co to Head Co; and
modified market value is added from Head Co to Sub Co.

Both of the losses in 'Bundle Head Co' are included in the 'total of real loss-maker's Division 170 of the ITAA 1997 losses in bundle' (as defined in subsection 707-325(4) of the IT(TP)A) in the application of section 707-325 of the IT(TP)A in respect of Donor Co.

Head Co seeks to choose, under subsection 707-327(4) of the IT(TP)A, to treat the tax loss originally incurred by Head Co for the 2001-02 income year as if it is included in Bundle Sub Co for the purposes of utilising that loss.

Reasons for Decision

Subsection 707-327(4) of the IT(TP)A states:

If the transferee mentioned in subsection 707-325(1) chooses, sections 707-310, 707-335 (except paragraph 707-335(2)(a)) and 707-340 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (and subsections 707-315(3) and (4) of that Act, so far as they relate to those sections) operate as if, at the initial transfer time:

(a)
the bundle of losses included the loss; and
(b)
the loss was not included in any other bundle of losses.

Note:
This section has the effect that the utilisation of the loss will be affected by the available fraction for the bundle of losses.

Effectively, the result of the choice under 707-327(4) of the IT(TP)A is that a loss that is in one bundle (the value donor bundle) can be treated as if it is included in another bundle of losses (the real loss-maker bundle) for the purposes of utilising that loss.

Head Co is a value donor to Sub Co and, if all of the conditions outlined in section 707-327 of the IT(TP)A are met, a loss in Bundle Head Co could be chosen to be treated as if it was included in Bundle Sub Co, for the purposes of utilising that loss.

However, subsection 707-327(6) of the IT(TP)A states:

Subsection (4) does not apply in relation to the loss if it was covered by paragraphs 707-325(1)(d) and (e) and subsection 707-325(2) in an application of section 707-325 separate from the application of that section mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) of this section.
Note:
This means that a loss that provided a basis for section 707-325 to apply in relation to the working out of the available fraction for a bundle of losses cannot be treated under this section as if it were included in another bundle of losses.

Effectively, subsection 707-327(6) of the IT(TP)A prevents a choice being made under subsection 707-327(4) of the IT(TP)A to donate a loss from the value donor bundle if, in a separate application of section 707-325 of the IT(TP)A:

modified market value has been donated to the value donor in its capacity as a real loss maker; and
the loss is covered by paragraphs 707-325(1)(d) and 707-325(1)(e) and subsection 707-325(2) of the IT(TP)A (that is, the loss is included in the 'total of real loss-maker's Division 170 losses in bundle' in the application of the formula in subsection 707-325(3) of the IT(TP)A).

Head Co is a real loss-maker in relation to the donation of modified market value from Donor Co. Therefore, the effect of subsection 707-327(6) of the IT(TP)A is that neither of the losses in Bundle Head Co could be donated to another bundle of losses.

In other words, because both of the losses in Bundle Head Co are Division 170 losses in respect of Donor Co, those losses cannot be donated to another bundle of losses.

Head Co, as the transferee, cannot make a choice, under subsection 707-327(4) of the IT(TP)A, to treat the tax loss (that was originally incurred by Head Co for the 2001-02 income year) in Bundle Head Co as if it was included in Bundle Sub Co because subsection 707-327(6) of the IT(TP)A prevents this choice being made in respect of this loss.

Date of decision:  10 February 2005

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2004

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   Division 170
   Subdivision 707-A

Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997
   section 707-325
   paragraph 707-325(1)(d)
   paragraph 707-325(1)(e)
   subsection 707-325(2)
   subsection 707-325(3)
   subsection 707-325(4)
   subsection 707-325(5)
   section 707-327
   subsection 707-327(4)
   subsection 707-327(6)

Keywords
Available fraction
Bundle of losses
Consolidation - joining
Consolidation - losses
Joining entity
Joining time
Modified market value
Transfer of losses
Value donor
Wholly owned

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  4354993

Business Line:  Consolidation Centre of Expertise

Date of publication:  18 February 2005

ISSN: 1445-2782