ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2006/293
Income Tax
Foreign exchange (forex) gains and losses: rights to receive foreign currency created or acquired in return for a third party paying an amount of foreign currency for your benefitFOI status: may be released
-
This ATO ID does not take account of the effect of Tax Laws Amendment (Taxation of Financial Arrangements) Act 2009 that implements Stages 3 and 4 of the reforms to the taxation of financial arrangements (TOFA 3 and 4).
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Does forex realisation event 2 occur when you withdraw an amount that was previously deposited by an agent, at your direction, into your foreign currency denominated investment account?
Decision
Yes. Forex realisation event 2 does occur when you withdraw an amount that was previously deposited by an agent, at your direction, into your foreign currency denominated investment account.
Facts
The taxpayer maintained a United Kingdom (UK) pound sterling investment account in the UK (the foreign currency bank account).
The taxpayer sold a property it owned in the UK and instructed their solicitor to deposit the proceeds from the sale of the property into the foreign currency bank account.
The taxpayer subsequently withdrew the balance from that account, converted into Australian dollars, and deposited the amount withdrawn into an Australian dollar denominated bank account in Australia.
Reasons for Decision
Forex realisation event 2 happens when a taxpayer ceases to have a right, or part of a right, to receive foreign currency, and the right or the part of the right is created or acquired in return for the taxpayer paying an amount of Australian currency or foreign currency (see paragraph 775-45(1)(a) and subparagraph 775-45(1)(b)(iii) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)).
The relationship between banker and customer in respect of a bank account is that of debtor and creditor (Foley v. Hill and Ors (1848) 2 HL Cas 28; [1843-60] All ER Rep 16). Thus, when a customer deposits money into a bank account the customer acquires contractual rights as a creditor of the bank. Similarly, when an amount is withdrawn from a bank account, some or all of these previously acquired rights are extinguished or satisfied.
The taxpayer therefore has the right to receive the balance standing to the credit of their foreign currency bank account (a right to receive a certain amount of foreign currency). This right to receive foreign currency is a relevant right within the terms of subparagraph 775-45(1)(b)(iii) of the ITAA 1997 if it can be said to have been acquired in return for the taxpayer paying or agreeing to pay an amount of Australian currency or foreign currency.
The funds were deposited by the taxpayer's agent, at the taxpayer's direction, into the foreign currency bank account. As a general rule of law, what a person may do him or herself, the person may do by an agent unless a statute requires a person to execute an act personally (JM Christie v. Permewan Wright & Co (1904) 1 CLR 693 at 700; Jackson & Co v. Napper (1887) 35 Ch D 162). There is nothing that specifically limits subparagraph 775-45(1)(b)(iii) of the ITAA 1997 to rights to receive foreign currency created or acquired in return for you personally paying an amount of Australian currency or foreign currency. Therefore, under general principles, rights created or acquired in return for a payment of an amount of foreign currency made by your agent also fall within the terms of the subparagraph.
In the context of this subparagraph, any payment made by a third party for and on the taxpayer's account and with the taxpayer's prior authority or subsequent ratification may be regarded as payment by the taxpayer (Simpson v. Eggington (1855) 10 Exch 845; Belshaw v. Bush (1851) 11 CB 191; James v. Isaacs (1852) 12 CB 791; Smith v. Cox [1940] 2 KB 558). Where relevant, the third party payment may be ratified by acquiescence (Lapraik v. Burrows (The Australia) (1859) 13 Moo PCC 132 at 158; 15 ER 50 at 60).
Therefore the total balance of the foreign currency bank account may be regarded as a right to receive foreign currency created or acquired in return for the taxpayer paying an amount of foreign currency.
The taxpayer's right to receive foreign currency ceased and forex realisation event 2 happened (pursuant to 775-45(1) of the ITAA 1997) when the taxpayer withdrew the balance of the foreign currency bank account.
Date of decision: 20 October 2006Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2006
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
section 775-45
Case References:
Belshaw v. Bush
(1851) 11 CB 191
(1848) 2 HL Cas 28
[1843-60] All ER Rep 16 Jackson & Co v. Napper
(1887) 35 Ch D 162 James v. Isaacs
(1852) 12 CB 791 JM Christie v. Permewan Wright & Co
(1904) 1 CLR 693 Lapraik v. Burrows (The Australia)
(1859) 13 Moo PCC 132
15 ER 50 Simpson v. Eggington
(1855) 10 Exch 845
(1855) 156 ER 683 Smith v. Cox
[1940] 2 KB 558 Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2004/855
Keywords
Foreign currency
Foreign exchange gains and losses
Forex realisation event
ISSN: 1445-2782