ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2001/536 (Withdrawn)
Income Tax
Superannuation, retirement and employment termination: Payment for restraint of tradeFOI status: may be released
-
This ATO ID is withdrawn as it is a simple restatement of the law and does not contain an interpretative decision.This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Is a payment received as consideration for the entry into a restraint of trade excluded from the definition of an eligible termination payment (ETP)?
Decision
Yes. The payment is not an ETP to the extent to which the Commissioner considers the amount reasonable having regard to the nature and extent of the restraint.
Facts
The taxpayer has been made redundant from his position. The employer has agreed to pay him an amount for restraint of trade.
Reasons for Decision
The definition of eligible termination payment is contained in subsection 27A(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936. The definition states in part:
'
eligible termination payment
, in relation to a taxpayer, means:
...
but does not include:
...
A payment for restraint of trade must be examined to determine whether it meets the above definition.
The Commissioner will consider whether:
- (a)
- the consideration is of a capital nature;
- (b)
- the consideration is for or in respect of restraint of trade;
- (c)
- the contract in restraint of trade is legally enforceable; and
- (d)
- the payment is reasonable having regard to the nature and extent of the restraint.
The Commissioner has no published guidelines on determining whether a payment is reasonable under this paragraph. Each case must be considered on its own merits.
Where the Commissioner decides that an amount is not an ETP, the payment (or part of it) may be assessable as a capital gain.
Date of decision: 26 September 2001Year of income: Year ending 30 June 2002
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
subsection 27A(1)
The Act Restraint of Trade Act 1976
the Act
Keywords
Eligible termination payments
Superannuation case reports
ETP exemptions and exclusions
ETP commissioner's discretion
ISSN: 1445-2782
Date: | Version: | |
26 September 2001 | Original statement | |
You are here | 16 April 2010 | Archived |