Draft Taxation Determination
TD 92/D201 (Withdrawn)
Income tax: sugar cane growers may receive a grant/subsidy from the Queensland Industries Development Corporation (QIDC) under the Commonwealth-State Scheme of Adjustment Assistance. When is this subsidy to be included in the assessable income of the recipient?
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this draft ruling.This document has been Withdrawn.
FOI status:
draft only - for commentPreamble
Draft Taxation Determinations (TDs) represent the preliminary, though considered, views of the ATO. Draft TDs may not be relied on; only final TDs are authoritative statements of the ATO. |
1. In the income year in which it is received . It is considered that in these circumstances the subsidy is income. This is supported by the decision in Lincolnshire Sugar Co, Ltd. v Smart, (1937) 20 TC 643. In this case it was held that the subsidies paid to the taxpayer were trade receipts assessable in the year of receipt.
2. Although the subsidy is paid directly to the lender to reduce the principal of the growers loan or to provide an interest subsidy over the term of the loan, section 19 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, deems it to be derived by the taxpayer when credited to the lender.
3. The subsidy is made to growers for the purpose of debt reconstruction, farm build-up or farm improvement. The subsidy is paid by QIDC either as:
- (i)
- a lump sum, equivalent in present value terms to the amount of the approved interest subsidy payable over a maximum period of seven years - assessable in full in the year it is credited to the taxpayer, or
- (ii)
- an approved interest subsidy over the term of the loan - assessable in each year as credited to the taxpayer.
Commissioner of Taxation
12/11/92
References
ATO references:
NO TOW14
Subject References:
Grants
Subsidies
Income
Cane growers
QIDC
Legislative References:
ITAA 19
Case References:
Lincolnshire Sugar Co Ltd v Smart (1937)
20 TC 643