• Legal database
Legal database

Draft Taxation Determination

TD 93/D250

Income tax: when does a person who is carrying on the business of licensing/sub-licensing the right to use proprietary computer software programs derive licence fee income under subsection 25(1) and/or paragraph 26(f) of the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936)?

  • Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this draft ruling.
    This document has been Withdrawn.
    View the Withdrawal notice for this document.

FOI status:

draft only - for comment

Preamble

Draft Taxation Determinations (TDs) present the preliminary, though considered, views of the ATO. Draft TDs may not be relied on; only final TDs are authoritative statements of the ATO.

1. Licence fee income is derived by the licensor when due under the terms of the licence agreement (Taxation Ruling IT 2669 paragraph 23).

2. A licence granting the right to use proprietary computer software is neither a contract for the rendering of services nor a contract for the supply of goods. Consequently, the licensor cannot rely on the decision in Arthur Murray (NSW) Pty Ltd v FC of T (1965) 114 CLR 314 to defer licence fee income past the date on which it becomes due. This also applies to fees properly attributable to further versions (upgrades) of the licenced program during the term of the agreement.

3. Where, however, the agreement includes licence and maintenance components, the amount which properly relates to maintenance services can be pro-rated over the term of the agreement in accordance with the decision in Arthur Murray.

Example:

Licensor, L Pty Ltd, an Australian company, enters into a licence agreement on 1 July 1991 with licensee, U Pty Ltd, which provides the right to use a proprietary computer software program for a term of 3 years. Maintenance service is also available under the agreement. A licence fee of $30,000 and service fee of $3,000 are payable on execution of the agreement.
The licence fee of $30,000 is derived when a legally enforceable debt arises to L Pty Ltd, ie, on execution of the agreement.
The service fee of $3,000 due to L Pty Ltd can be pro-rated over the term of the agreement ie, 3 years.

Commissioner of Taxation
30 September 1993

References


BO CWD Case 221 & 350

ISSN 1038 - 8982

Related Rulings/Determinations:

IT 2669
IT 2660

Subject References:
licence fee
computer software
derivation of income

Legislative References:
ITAA ss6(1)
ITAA 25(1)
ITAA 26(f)

Case References:
Arthur Murray (NSW) Pty Ltd v FC of T
(1965) 114 CLR 314
14 ATD 98
9 AITR 673


Back to top