Draft Taxation Determination
TD 94/D88
Income tax: are gifts to approved funds deductible under subsection 78(4) or subsection 78(5) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 if the donor receives a material benefit in return?
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this draft ruling.This document has been Withdrawn.View the Withdrawal notice for this document.
FOI status:
draft only - for commentPreamble
Draft Taxation Determinations (TDs) represent the preliminary, though considered, views of the ATO. Draft TDs may not be relied on; only final TDs are authoritative statements of the ATO. |
1. No, to be a 'gift' for taxation purposes, the money or property must be given voluntarily and the donor must not receive any material benefit (FC of T v. McPhail (1968) 117 CLR 111). The receipt of something of trifling or insubstantial value, such as a sticker, is not a material benefit.
2. Where a material benefit is received, the payment is not a 'gift' and is therefore not tax deductible.
Examples
(a) Shannon donates $10 to a well-known charity and receives a plastic lapel badge. The payment is a tax deductible gift because no material benefit was received.
(b) Stuart gives $20 to a public benevolent institution and receives a packet of Christmas cards. The payment is not a gift because Stuart has received a material benefit. The result is the same if Stuart had received theatre, ball or dinner tickets, a diary, a bottle of wine, or any other item of value.
(c) At an auction conducted by a public hospital, Desiree makes a successful bid of $100 for a new radio. Desiree wants to claim the difference between the bid price and actual cost of the radio as a 'gift'. No part of the payment is a gift because Desiree has received a material benefit.
Commissioner of Taxation
18 August 1994
This Draft Determination has been withdrawn from 30/08/95
References
ATO references:
NO BRI 0032
Related Rulings/Determinations:
TD 92/110
TD 93/57
IT 2071
IT 2443
Subject References:
gifts
conditional gifts
Legislative References:
ITAA 78(4)
ITAA 78(5)
Case References:
FC of T v. McPhail
(1968) 117 CLR 111