Disclaimer This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011496935311
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: Capital gains tax - small business concessions
Question
Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion to extend the replacement asset period under subsection 104-190 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) until the dated requested?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following period:
1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2009
Relevant facts and circumstances
The taxpayer owned and operated a business. The business consisted of a number of separate parts which were sold separately.
The taxpayer elected to use the small business roll-over in the relevant income tax return on the remaining net capital gain. As the gain was rolled over in a specific income tax return, the taxpayer was mistakenly under the impression that they had until the end of a certain income tax year to purchase the replacement asset.
The taxpayer has now purchased a suitable replacement asset.
The taxpayer has stated that it was always their intention to use the roll-over and only failed to do so within the relevant period as they were mistaken as to the time limit that was available.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 104-190(2),
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 104-197(1),
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 104-197(2),
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 104-197(5),
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-410 and
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-415.
Reasons for decision
Under subsection 104-197(1) of the ITAA 1997, CGT event J5 happens if you chose a small business roll-over under Subdivision 152-E of the ITAA 1997 and have not acquired a replacement asset by the end of the replacement asset period.
Subsection 104-197(5) of the ITAA 1997 provides for the replacement asset period to be modified or extended.
The Commissioner may exercise his discretion to extend the replacement asset period, as provided in subsection 104-190(2) of the ITAA 1997.
In determining if the discretion to allow a period longer than 2 years would be exercised, the Commissioner has considered the following factors:
- whether there is evidence of an acceptable explanation for the period of extension requested and whether it would be fair and equitable in the circumstances to provide such an extension
- whether there is any prejudice to the Commissioner if the additional time is allowed, however the mere absence of prejudice is not enough to justify the granting of an extension
- whether there is any unsettling of people, other than the Commissioner, or of established practices
- fairness to people in like positions and the wider public interest
- whether there is any mischief involved, and
- the consequences of the decision.
Application to your circumstances
After considering the relevant facts against your circumstances, it is considered that you have provided a reasonable and acceptable explanation for the delay in acquiring a replacement asset. By allowing an extension of time it would not prejudice the Commissioner, nor is it unfair to other people in similar positions.
Based on the facts and your submission, it is considered that the Commissioner will exercise his discretion to extend the replacement asset period until the date requested.