Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011600652034

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Capital gains tax

Question

Does the compensation payment form part of the capital proceeds when calculating capital gains tax?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2009.

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2008.

Relevant facts

You purchased a block of land with a shed on it a number of years ago.

You used this shed as your main residence until you purchased another home xx years ago.

You had no other main residence.

The shed was your home and had the power and water connected and your mail was delivered to the property.

You moved into the property as soon as settlement occurred.

In xxxx the property was purchased by an entity who also paid you compensation.

The compensation package was to cover the costs that would be incurred in purchasing a similar property, removal and storage of the contents, inconvenience, etc

The capital gains tax was apportioned.

You paid the capital gains on the xxxx years that the property was not your main residence.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10.

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 116-20(1).

Reasons for decision

Subsection 116-20(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) states that the capital proceeds from a CGT event are the total of:

    · the money you have received, or are entitled to receive, in respect of the event happening, and

    · the market value of any other property you have received, or are entitled to receive, in respect of the event happening (worked out as at the time of the event).

CGT event A1 in section 104-10 of the ITAA 1997, relating to the disposal of a CGT asset, happened when you disposed of your property to xxxx. The $xx you received for the property is included in the capital proceeds from the CGT event.

The compensation payment of $xx is to be included in the capital proceeds from the disposal of your property as it is an amount received for the event (the loss of the property that was acquired by the State Government agency) happening. The following facts are relevant to that conclusion:

The full payment was received by you at the time of the sale of the property and there was no requirement to use the compensation payment for any particular purpose.

The purchase price plus the additional compensation payment can reasonably be seen as compensation for the loss of the original property. That is, they represent a reasonable assessment of the compensable loss that results from the disposal of your property to the State Government agency.

The fact that amounts included in the compensation payment are calculated under different headings does not determine the character of the payments. The concepts that a payment is for the disposal of the property and part of that payment has an intended use in your hands, are not mutually exclusive.