Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011613195060

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: assessability of compensation payment

Question

Is the compensation payment you received, considered assessable income?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2010

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2009

Relevant facts

You were engaged on a casual basis.

Your employment ceased after several months.

You took your employer to the equal opportunity commission alleging discrimination.

In order to avoid further costs and inconvenience, both parties agreed to settle the proceedings.

Your employer agreed to pay you a settlement amount being compensation for the complaint in full and final payment of your claim.

This compensation payment did not include wages or financial losses.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 118-37(1)(b)

Reasons for decision

Section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), provides that the assessable income of a taxpayer includes income according to ordinary concepts.

Ordinary income has generally been held to include three categories, namely, income from rendering personal services, income from property and income from carrying on a business.

Other characteristics of income that have evolved from case law include receipts that are earned, expected, relied upon and have an element of periodicity, recurrence or regularity.

In your situation the payment was in lieu of a claim for compensation. The payment was not earned by you as it does not relate to services performed. The payment is also a one off payment and thus it does not have an element of recurrence or regularity. Although the payment can be said to be expected, and perhaps relied upon, this expectation does not arise from a relationship to personal services performed.

Accordingly, the payment is not ordinary income and is therefore not assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.

Taxation Ruling TR 95/35 deals with the capital gains treatment of compensation receipts. The ruling advocates a 'look-through' approach, which identifies the most relevant asset to which the compensation amount is most directly related. Paragraph 11 of TR 95/35 states that if an amount is not received in respect of an underlying asset, the amount relates to the disposal by the taxpayer of the right to seek compensation.

As the amount received is not in respect of any underlying asset, the whole of the settlement amount is treated as capital proceeds from a capital gains tax (CGT) event happening to the right to seek compensation.

However, paragraph 118-37(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 disregards a capital gain made from a CGT event where the amount relates to compensation or damages received for any 'wrong, injury or illness you ... suffer personally'. . As such, CGT implications with regards to the payment are disregarded.