Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011693304994

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Medical expenses tax offset

Question

Do the fees you paid for a program to assist your children's medical condition qualify as medical expenses for the purposes of the medical expenses tax offset?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following period

The year ended the 30 June 2010

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2009

Relevant facts

You have dependant children who have been diagnosed with a medical condition.

You enrolled your children into a particular program, after viewing an article on their program and its effects on children with certain medical conditions.

Your medical practitioner completed sections of the organisations medical consent form. Information contained in the medical consent form is used to develop the clients program and for reviewing their progress.

You medical practitioner did not provide you with a referral to the organisation.

There is no interaction between your medical practitioner and the organisation and no report on your children's progress is instigated by the organisation or your medical practitioner.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 159P(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 159P(4)

Reasons for decision

A medical expenses tax offset is available to a taxpayer under subsection 159P(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) where the taxpayer pays medical expenses in an income year for themselves or a dependant who is an Australian resident, to the extent that they are not reimbursed, or are eligible to be reimbursed, from a government or public authority or a society, association or fund.

The medical expenses tax offset is 20% of the amount by which the net medical expenses exceed $1,500 for the 2009-10 income year.

Paragraph (d) of the definition of medical expenses in subsection 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936 includes payments made for therapeutic treatment administered by direction of a legally qualified medical practitioner.

It was held in Case A53 69 ATC 313; 15 CTBR (NS) Case 30 that the mere suggestion or recommendation by a medical practitioner that the patient undergoes therapeutic treatment is not sufficient for the payment to qualify as medical expenses. The patient would have to be referred by a medical practitioner to a particular person for specific treatment.

Therapeutic treatment as a concept is concerned with healing or curing, rather than preventing the need for therapy (Case T67 (1968) 18 TRBD 346; (1967) 14 CTBR (NS) Case 31). Therapeutic treatment involves the exercise of professional skill in the medical field in a way which normally involves the person administering the treatment using drugs or physical or mental processes of one kind or another for the purpose of curing or managing the disease or ailment (Case R95 84 ATC 633; (1984) 27 CTBR (NS) Case 148).

Although the treatment must be administered by direction of a legally qualified medical practitioner, the treatment need not be administered by such a practitioner.

In your case, the program was not recommended by your medical practitioner. They did not provide you with a referral to participate in the program nor have they closely monitored your children's progress and, the skills exercised in the program are not in the medical field. As such, your children's participation in the program is not part of a treatment administered under the instruction or guidance of a physician.

Therefore, the fees you have paid for the program do not qualify as eligible medical expenses under paragraph (d) of the definition in subsection 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936 and cannot be included when calculating the medical expenses tax offset.