Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011694498157

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Travel Expenses

Question

Are you entitled to a deduction for cost of travel and accommodation expenses for travel between home and work?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ending 30 June 2011

Year ending 30 June 2012

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2010

Relevant facts

You and your spouse lived and worked in Town A .

In a particular year your spouse was transferred to Town B to work.

You transferred to Town B with your spouse and worked in a relief position.

Due to a lack of work opportunities you intend to return to Town A to work and travel back to the family home in Town B on a weekly basis.

You will not receive an allowance for travel or accommodation.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1

Reasons for decision

Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income, or are necessarily incurred in carrying on a business for that purpose. However, a deduction is not allowable for outgoings that are of a capital, private or domestic nature.

Generally, accommodation expenses are private in nature and are not deductible. In Lunney v. FC of T (1958) 100 CLR 478 the Full High Court laid down the principle that for a deduction to be allowable it is not enough for the expenditure to be an essential prerequisite to the derivation of assessable income. In that case it was held that the costs incurred by a taxpayer in travelling to the place where they work are expenses incurred in order to enable them to earn income but are not expenses incurred in the course of earning that income.

The issue of expenses incurred in relation to accommodation near the work place while maintaining a family residence in another location was considered in FC of T v. Toms 89 ATC 4373; (1989) 20 ATR 466 (Toms' Case).

In Toms' Case, the taxpayer was a forest worker who during the working week lived in a caravan in a bush camp 108 kilometres from his family home in Grafton. He claimed it was too far to travel each day to his work in the forest, so that it was necessary to establish a caravan at the camp. He would return home on weekends. He claimed the costs of maintaining his caravan and other living expenses such as the cost of heating and lighting. The Federal Court considered that the caravan was rendered necessary as much by the taxpayer's choice of the place of his residence in Grafton as by his choice of employment in the forest, and its purpose was to enable him to retain his residence at Grafton although employed in the forest. It was held that the expenses incurred in relation to the temporary accommodation near the workplace while maintaining a family residence in another location were dictated not by his work but by private considerations, and therefore were not deductible.

In your case, you will incur expenses for accommodation and travel to enable you to commute between your home in one town and your employment in another town. Whilst the expenses would not be incurred except for the distance of your work place from your family home, the expenses are a prerequisite to the earning of assessable income. They are incurred in order to enable you to earn income but are not incurred in the course of gaining or producing that income.

A deduction is therefore not allowable for your accommodation and travel expenses under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.