Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011721048216
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: Capital Gains Tax
Question
Will Capital Gains Tax (CGT) be payable under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) in respect of the disposal of an asset acquired by you in your capacity as a beneficiary of a deceased estate?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following period:
1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010.
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2009
Relevant facts and circumstances
Your parent had purchased a block of land prior to 20 September 1985. Subsequent to that date, you inherited a share in the block from their estate. The land was sold some time later.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 110-25,
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 110-35 and
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 115-100.
Does Part IVA apply to this ruling?
Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) is a general anti-avoidance rule that can apply in certain circumstances if you or another taxpayer obtains a tax benefit in connection with an arrangement and it can be concluded that the arrangement, or any part of it, was entered into or carried out by any person for the dominant purpose of enabling a tax benefit to be obtained. If Part IVA applies the tax benefit can be cancelled, for example, by disallowing a deduction that was otherwise allowable.
We have not fully considered the application of Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 to the arrangement you asked us to rule on, or to an associated or wider arrangement of which that arrangement is part. If you want us to rule on whether Part IVA applies we will first need to obtain and consider all the facts about the arrangement which are relevant to determining whether Part IVA may apply.
For more information on Part IVA, go to our website and enter 'part iva general' in the search box on the top right of the page, then select: Part IVA: the general anti-avoidance rule for income tax.
Reasons for decision
Unless otherwise stated, all legislative references in the following Reasons for Decision are to the ITAA 1997.
Detailed reasoning
When you inherit a block of land from a deceased estate, you are taken to have acquired the asset on the day that the deceased taxpayer died. If the deceased had acquired the property before 20 September 1985, the cost of the asset in the hands of the beneficiary is its market value at the date of the taxpayer's death. That will be the case in the present instance, where the block of land was acquired before that date.
As previously advised, any capital gain which you make on disposal of the property is determined by deducting your cost base from the capital proceeds of the sale. The cost base includes not just the value of the property but also any additional costs incurred in acquiring, holding or disposing of it e.g. real estate agent fees. The elements of the cost base are discussed in greater detail at sections 110-25 and 110-35. You have not identified the full extent of any additional costs so we will ignore them for the purposes of this ruling. Nevertheless, you should be mindful of the fact that any relevant expenses can be added to the cost base in determining a final figure.
Bearing in mind that the date on which your parent acquired the block was prior to 20 September 1985, the first element of the cost base of the land for your purposes will be its market value at the date at which your parent died. The capital gain is determined by deducting the cost base from the consideration received on disposal.
Subdivision 115-A provides for a discount on the capital gain which would otherwise be assessable if the requirements of its provisions are met. In your case, the capital gain would qualify for that concession. Section 115-100 allows for a discount of 50% of the capital gain which would otherwise be assessable. That reduces the assessable capital gain by half. Your share of that assessable gain should be added to your assessable income for the relevant year. It will then be subject to tax at your marginal rate of tax.
For assets acquired at or before 21 September 1999, there is an alternative method of calculating your assessable capital gain which involves the indexation of the cost base for movements in the Consumer Price Index. That method can be found at section 114-1. It has not been discussed at length because it is likely to result in a larger capital gain in the present case.