Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011749093764
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: Prepaid Cards
Questions
1. For the purposes of item 1 in the table in subregulation 40-5.09(3) of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Regulations, 1999 (GST Regulations), is the provision of a prepaid card by Entity A to a Entity C under a Program the provision to the Entity C of an interest in an account made available by Entity A?
2. For the purposes of Section 9-5 of the GST Act, are the services provided to Entity B that are referred to in the Program Fees an aim in themselves and therefore taxable supplies made to Entity B, if they are provided for consideration?
(a) Alternatively, are those services provided to Entity B, so closely linked to the accounts provided to Entity C that they form, objectively, a single, indivisible economic supply, which it would be artificial to split and as such the services are merely incidental to the provision of the accounts to Entity C?
3. If services provided to Entity B is a taxable supply when provided for consideration, please confirm the total consideration for the taxable supply would be the fees charged to Entity B under the negotiated Program between Entity A and Entity B.
Answers
1. The Commissioner ruled that for the purposes of item 1 in the table in subregulation
40-5.09(3) of the GST Regulations, the provision of a prepaid card by Entity A to a Entity C under a Program is the provision to the Entity C of an interest in an account made available by Entity A.
2. The Commissioner ruled that for the purposes of section 9-5 of the GST Act, the services provided that are referred to in the Program Fees are an aim in themselves and therefore taxable supplies made to Entity B, if they are provided for consideration
3. The Commissioner confirmed that the total consideration for the taxable supply would be the fees charged to Entity B under the negotiated Program between Entity A and Entity B.