Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011789994500
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: Income Tax: Assessable income and deductible expenses - life insurance policy proceeds and premiums
Question 1
Are the proceeds received by the company in respect of the life insurance policies assessable income under section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?
Answer: No
Question 2
Are the premiums paid for the life insurance policies deductible expenses under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997?
Answer: No
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 31 July 2010
The scheme commences on:
06 June 2006
Relevant facts and circumstances
Background
The company was the owner and beneficiary of two life insurance policies.
The life insured by the policies was that of the Managing Director of the company.
The Board of Directors recognised that the Managing Director played an extremely critical role in managing the operations of the company and determined it was prudent to take out the life insurance policies to protect the capital base of the company in the event of the Managing Director's death.
In the 2010 financial year the Managing Director died and the company received payouts on both life insurance policies.
Policies
The policy details are as follows:
Policy Number 1:
Type of insurance - Life insurance for Managing Director
Policy owner - The company
Sum insured - $x,xxx
Commencement date - 2006
Expiry date - 2047
Policy Number 2:
Type of insurance - Life insurance for Managing Director
Policy owner - The company
Sum insured - $x,xxx
Commencement date - 2007
Expiry date - 2048
The total cover of these policies was $x,xxx
Purpose
The purpose of the insurance was to protect the company against any adverse impacts on its balance sheet resulting from the untimely death of the Managing Director. In particular, the policies were taken out to ensure that the company would have suitable funds to:
· Protect their capital structure
· Protect the goodwill they built with customers
· Repay any loans or debts that could be called in due to the death of the Managing Director
· Protect the strong credit rating they had with major suppliers.
Payouts
Prior to the Managing Director's death in 2010, the Insurance Company made an assessment that the Managing Director's terminal illness meant that the company met the terms and conditions for the policies to be paid.
The total payout from the policies was $x,xxx
Premiums
Premiums were paid by the company for each policy.
The premiums paid by the company in respect of the life insurance policies have been claimed as a tax deduction in prior years.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Question 1
Summary
The lump sum payments would not constitute ordinary income and therefore are not assessable under subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997.
Detailed reasoning
Subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the assessable income of a resident taxpayer includes ordinary income derived directly or indirectly from all sources during the income year.
Income Tax Ruling IT 155 (IT 155) provides guidance as to the assessability of premiums paid in respect of life insurance for key man insurance policies. The term "key man" insurance is used in the industry to denote insurance on the life of a director, partner, employer or other "key" person associated with the taxpayer in business. The types of policies involved are whole of life, endowment, term (or temporary) life assurance, sickness and accident insurance.
IT 155 provides that it has been the Commissioner's practice in relation to insurance policies taken out by employers in respect of their employees to treat the proceeds as non-assessable if a life policy is involved. Income Tax Ruling IT 2434 confirms the position that the proceeds of policies on the life of an employee are of a capital nature and do not form part of the assessable income of the recipient company.
The life insurance policies for the director were owned by the company and the premiums were paid by the company. The life insurance policies terms and conditions specifically state that the insurer will pay the policy owner a lump sum equal to the sum insured if the insured person dies prior to the expiry date of the policy or that they will pay a lump sum amount of 100% of the sum insured if the insured person is diagnosed with a terminal illness that is likely to result in death of the insured person within 12 months of the diagnosis regardless of any treatment that may be undertaken.
The insurance company accepted the taxpayers claim and paid the full benefit payment for each policy to the taxpayer as it was determined that the insured persons medical condition met the definition of terminal illness as per the terms and conditions of the policies.
The lump sum payment is not earned by the taxpayer as it does not directly relate to services performed. The payments would constitute one-off payments and thus do not have an element of recurrence or regularity. Although the payments can be said to be expected, and perhaps relied upon, this expectation arises from the investment in insurance, rather than from a relationship with personal services performed. Thus, the lump sum payments would constitute capital receipts.
Therefore, the lump sum payments would not constitute ordinary income and therefore are not assessable under subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997.
Question 2
Summary
The expenses relating to the premiums are not deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 as the premiums are considered to be outgoings of a capital nature.
Detailed reasoning
Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income.
Income Tax Ruling IT 155 provides guidance as to the assessability and deductibility of premiums paid in respect of key man life insurance. The term key man insurance is used in the industry to denote insurance on the life of a director, partner, employer or other key person associated with the taxpayer in business.
It has been the Commissioner's practice as stated in IT 155 in relation to insurance policies taken out by employers in respect of their employees to treat the premiums as non-deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 if a life policy is involved. Life insurance premiums are considered to be outgoings of a capital nature.
In this case the life insurance policies were owned by the taxpayer. The insured person was a company director. The life insurance was payable if the insured person dies or becomes terminally ill. Therefore, IT 155 would apply to the taxpayer because insurance premium expenses are in relation to key man life insurance policies.
Based on the facts supplied, the expenses relating to the premiums are not deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 as the premiums are considered to be outgoings of a capital nature.
As a result, amendments to prior year income tax returns of the company will need to be made as the company claimed deductions for the life insurance premiums they paid.