Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012080099910
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.
Ruling
Subject: Division 7A and commercial debt forgiveness
Issue
This ruling concerned the sale of a property by a company.
This ruling applies for the following period:
The financial year ended 30 June 2012.
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2011.
Relevant facts and circumstances
This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.
The company owns pre-CGT property. The company is going to sell the property.
Relevant legislative provisions
section 104-5 of the ITAA 1997
section 104-10 of the ITAA 1997
subsection 104-10(5) of the ITAA 1997
section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997
subsection 104-25(3) of the ITAA 1997
section 104-230 of the ITAA 1997
subsection 104-230(2) of the ITAA 1997
paragraph 104-230(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997
paragraph 104-230(2)(b) of the ITAA 1997
subsection 104-230(8) of the ITAA 1997
section 118-20 of the ITAA 1997
section 149-10 of the ITAA 1997
subsection 149-15(1) of the ITAA 1997
section 149-30 of the ITAA 1997
Division 245 of the ITAA 1997
section 245-35 of Schedule 2C to the ITAA 1997
subsection 245-35(1) of Schedule 2C to the ITAA 1997
section 245-36 of Schedule 2C to the ITAA 1997
section 44 of the ITAA 1936
subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936
section 47 of the ITAA 1936
subsection 47(1) of the ITAA 1936
subsection 47(1A) of the ITAA 1936
subsection 47(2) of the ITAA 1936
subsection 47(2A) of the ITAA 1936
subsection 47(2B) of the ITAA 1936
section 109D of the ITAA 1936
subsection 109D(1A) of the ITAA 1936
section 109F of the ITAA 1936
subsection 109F(1) of the ITAA 1936
subsection 109F(8) of the ITAA 1936
section 109N of the ITAA 1936
section 109NA of the ITAA 1936
section 601AA of the Corporations Act 1989
Reasons for decision
The Commissioner has ruled on each of the specific questions.