Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012123465621
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.
Ruling
Subject: journey accident cover
Question
Are the payments you received from a journey accident cover insurance policy included in your assessable income?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 2012
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2011
Relevant facts and circumstances
The arrangement that is the subject of the private ruling is described below. This description is based on the following documents. These documents form part of and are to be read with this description. The relevant documents are:
· the application for private ruling,
· the documents provided with the application for private ruling, and
· the documents provided in response to the request for further information.
You were involved in two car accidents on your way to work that were not your fault. You have only made a claim in regards to the second accident.
As a result of your claim, you have been receiving payments from a journey accident cover insurance policy that free as part of your membership with a union.
You are covered for up to a certain amount per week, depending on your weekly earnings, for a finite period while you are off work.
You have received five payments under the insurance policy.
The payments are calculated using your average weekly income and the insurance company has not withheld any tax from your payments.
The payments do not cover any medical expenses.
You will receive payments up until your sick certificate expires. However, further amounts may be received if your doctor does not deem you fit to work.
You have requested that the payments received under the insurance policy be exempt from taxation based on your personal circumstances.
You have stated that the payments have been paid to you for the physical and emotional injuries that resulted from the car accident.
Your contract with your employer has ceased. Your employer would not give you a permanent position due to the fact that you had not been at work enough since the car accident.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 6-5.
Reasons for decision
Summary
The journey accident cover payments effectively replace your income from salary and wages. Therefore, the payments received by you are assessable income under section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997).
Detailed reasoning
Subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the assessable income of a resident taxpayer includes ordinary income derived directly or indirectly from all sources during the income year.
Based on case law, it can be said that ordinary income generally includes receipts that are earned, expected, relied upon and have an element of periodicity, recurrence or regularity. Payments of salary and wages for example, are income according to ordinary concepts and are included in assessable income under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.
For income tax purposes, an amount paid to compensate for a loss generally acquires the character of that for which it is substituted: Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Dixon (1952) 86 CLR 540; (1952) 5 AITR 443; 10 ATD 82. Compensation payments which substitute income have been held by the courts to be income under ordinary concepts: Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Inkster (1989) 24 FCR 53; (1989) 20 ATR 1516; 89 ATC 5142, Tinkler v. FC of T (1979) 10 ATR 411; 79 ATC 4641, and Case Y47 (1991) 22 ATR 3422; 91 ATC 433.
A periodical benefit paid under an insurance policy is intended to provide financial support and assistance for the person insured. While not earned, such payments are expected and relied upon by the insured, and being paid periodically, are recurring and regular. These benefits paid under a policy of insurance effectively replace a taxpayer's income from salary and wages.
Amounts that are received in respect of personal injuries which are not for reimbursement of medical expenses, or direct compensation for loss of income will usually be capital in nature.
In your case, your membership with a union provides journey accident cover when you are travelling to and from work. You were involved in a car accident while travelling to work and could no longer attend your employment. As a result, the insurance company paid regular amounts to you based on your average weekly income. The amounts were payable for a finite period while you were off work and did not cover any of your medical expenses. The payments you received were not in respect of personal injuries, but instead were in effect a replacement of your wages. Therefore, the payments you received are assessable income under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.