Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012172425244
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fac sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.
Ruling
Subject: Income Tax - Capital Gains Tax - cost base and reduced cost base
Question 1
Is the cost base and reduced cost base for the property (the Apartment) owned by the entity the amount of $Y + $S + $T.
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Income year ended 30 June 2012.
The scheme commences on:
1 January 200X.
Relevant facts and circumstances
The entity is a private company registered in a certain year.
Upon its registration the entity entered into a partnership by providing 25% of the required capital to purchase and develop an apartment complex.
A few years later in 200X, the entity acquired the Apartment for $X. In an earlier audit, the Commissioner determined that the entity had acquired the Apartment for a market value of $Y, based on the State Revenue Office levying stamp duty on that market value.
The entity was levied $S stamp duty by the State Revenue Office and a $T Titles Registry fee by the State Land Registry as a result of acquiring the Apartment.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 100-25
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 110-25(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 110-25(2)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 110-25(3)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 110-25(6)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 110-35(4)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 110-55(2)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 112-20(1)(c)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 112-20(2)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 977-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 977-50
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 977-55(a)
Reasons for decision
Summary
The cost base and reduced cost base for the Apartment owned by the entity is the amount of $Y + $S + $T.
Detailed reasoning
Cost base
In accordance with subsection 110-25(1) the cost base of a CGT asset, which for the purposes of the CGT asset definition in section 100-25 will include real property such as the Apartment, will consist of five elements.
The first element is defined by subsection 110-25(2) to include the money paid in respect of acquiring the CGT asset. Based on the relevant facts, the first element of the Apartment's cost base at this stage will be the $X paid in early 200X.
The market value substitution rule in paragraph 112-20(1)(c) however modifies the first element by substituting the money paid with the asset's market value. Based on the relevant facts, the first element of the Apartment's cost base is now $Y as opposed to $X, based on the deemed market value of $Y. Please note that subsection 112-20(2) does not apply:
· as the Commissioner determined in an earlier audit that the Apartment is a revenue asset in accordance with section 977-50
· as per paragraph 977-55(a), the disposal of a revenue asset is a realisation event, and
· as per section 977-5, a realisation event for a CGT asset is a CGT event (i.e. in this instance CGT event A1 as per section 104-10).
The second element is defined by subsection 110-25(3) to be the incidental costs incurred in acquiring the CGT asset. Stamp duty is defined by subsection 110-35(4) to be an incidental cost. Therefore based on the relevant facts, the second element of the Apartment's cost base is $S.
The fifth element is defined by subsection 110-25(6) to be the capital expenditure incurred to establish the title of the acquired CGT asset. The $T Titles Registry fee levied by the State Land Registry would be such capital expenditure. Therefore based on the relevant facts, the fifth element of the Apartment's cost base is $T.
The addition of the first, second and fifth elements results in the Apartment having a cost base of $Y + $S + $T.
Reduced cost base
Subsection 110-55(2) states that with the exception of the third element, all of the elements of the reduced cost base of a CGT asset are the same as those for the cost base. As the Apartment has no third element, its reduced cost base is also $Y + $S + $T.