Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012237510617

    This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

    Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.

Ruling

Subject: Interest deductibility after the income producing activity has ceased

Question

Are you entitled to an interest deduction on a loan where you have used part of the loan to purchase shares and used the remainder to refinance previous loans on rental properties?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods

Year ended 30 June 2012

Year ended 30 June 2013

Year ended 30 June 2014

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2008

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

You invested in a number of residential properties with the intention of deriving profit from rent received.

You sold these properties, some at a loss, and applied the proceeds of the sales against the loans for these properties, but you did not have sufficient funds to pay out the principal of the loan.

The original loans were 'interest only' loans with no fixed terms.

Over 8 years ago you refinanced and entered into a new loan agreement to pay out the original loans and to purchase shares.

You purchased the shares through managed funds, from which you earn dividends.

You planned to pay the loan principal with gains that you expect from your shares.

Since refinancing, you have not had any significant funds available that you could have applied in repayment of the loan principal.

The loan agreement has provision to make lump sum payments off the principal of the loan.

You have commitments in servicing your home loan, paying for your children to study full-time, and paying the investment loan interest payments. This means you are unable to pay out the existing loan.

All dividends from the share portfolio are used to cover the costs of the loan for the shares and fees associated with the managed fund.

You have a small number of Australian shares.

You have a small amount of money in one bank account which is used for your living expenses.

The loan amount is currently as it was when you first drew down on it. You paid interest only on the loan in the last financial year.

The loan duration is for more than 20 years.

Your financial situation has deteriorated as your spouse has had a serious medical condition which has limited their earning capacity.

You hope to be in a better financial position by the end of the ruling period, and to be able to repay the loan.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1.

Reasons for decision

Interest Expense

Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature.

Taxation Ruling TR 95/25 considers the deductibility of interest. Whether interest has been incurred in the course of producing assessable income generally depends on the use to which the borrowed funds have been put.

Taxation Ruling TR 2004/4 discusses interest which accrues after the income producing activity for which a loan was raised has ceased, and considers the nexus between the outgoing and the income earning activities.

Where interest has been incurred over a period after the relevant borrowings (or assets representing those borrowings) have been lost to the taxpayer and relevant income earning activities have ceased, it is apparent that the interest is not incurred in gaining or producing assessable income. However, the outgoing will still have been incurred in gaining or producing 'the assessable income' if the occasion of the outgoing is to be found in whatever was productive of assessable income of an earlier period.

An outgoing of interest in such circumstances will not fail to be deductible merely because the original loan is refinanced.

However, if the taxpayer keeps the loan on foot for reasons unassociated with the former income earning activities; or extends the loan for reasons unrelated to earning assessable income as the original loan was, the nexus between the outgoings of interest and the relevant income earning activities will be broken.

In your case, the original loans were entered into to acquire income-producing assets and not for any other purpose. The funds were used to purchase investment properties which produced rental income. Furthermore, an obligation was undertaken to pay interest until the principal was repaid. You then sold the properties and applied the proceeds of the sales towards the loans. You were not in a financial position to repay the entire amount of the loans, as opposed to maintaining the loans for other reasons.

You decided to refinance the loans and you entered into a new loan agreement to include an amount sufficient to extinguish the previous rental loans plus an additional amount to purchase shares.

The issue, therefore, is whether selling the investment property or refinancing severs the connection between the incurring of the interest expenses and your previous income producing activity.

In your circumstances, the selling of the rental property and refinancing did not sever the nexus with your previous income earning activities and the incurring of the interest on those funds used to pay out the rental loans is sufficiently proximate to your former income earning activities for the interest to be deductible.

Your existing financial resources and state of liquidity are not sufficient for you to repay the loan principal.

Although the issue of the amount of time between the income earning activity for which the original loan was used must be taken into account, it is not considered that you are keeping the loan on foot for reasons unassociated with the original income earning activities.

In relation to that portion of your loan relating to the purchase of shares, Taxation Ruling IT 2606 states that where interest is incurred on funds used to acquire shares, the interest expenses are deductible, provided that there is an expectation of dividends or other assessable income. The expectation will usually exist as shares are inherently capable of generating dividends. The expectation must be reasonable and not a mere theoretical possibility. A deduction will not be allowable where the shares are acquired solely for the purpose of a capital profit on resale.

In your case you have earned dividends from your share purchases.

Accordingly, you are entitled to a deduction under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 for the interest expenses incurred on the borrowed funds you used to refinance your outstanding rental property loans and to purchase dividend-yielding shares.