| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012301427070
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.
Ruling
Subject: Investment expenses
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for fees paid to your financial advisor?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 2012
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2011
Relevant facts and circumstances
You paid a fee to your financial advisor.
You are not carrying on a business of investing.
The fee was paid for advice to restructure your current investments.
You main source of income is from your investments.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 8-1.
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature.
Taxation Determination TD 95/60 deals with the issue of whether fees paid for obtaining investment advice are an allowable deduction for taxpayers who are not carrying on an investment business.
TD 95/60 explains that a fee for drawing up a financial plan is not deductible because it is not expenditure incurred in the course of gaining or producing the assessable income from the investments. It is too early in time to be an expense that is part of the income producing process as it is an expense that is associated with putting the income earning investments in place.
Taxation Ruling IT 39 deals with expenditure incurred in servicing an investment portfolio. It explains that expenses to service a portfolio are incurred in relation to the management of income producing investments and have a revenue character.
However, to be wholly deductible, all of the fee must relate to gaining or producing assessable income. If the advice covers other matters or relates in part to investments that do not produce assess income, only a portion of the fee is deductible.
Paragraph 6 of TD 95/60 states that:
Over the period of an investment plan advice may be received suggesting changes be made to the mix of investments held. This would normally be part and parcel of managing the investments in accordance with the plan. This advice may be from the original investment adviser or from a new adviser. Provided the advice is not in relation to drawing up an investment plan it will be an allowable deduction...
In your case, you paid a fee to a financial advisor to restructure your current investments. This fee is considered to be incurred to manage your investment portfolio. Therefore, you are entitled to a deduction for the fee under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.