Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012393529545
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.
Ruling
Subject: Exemption from Income Tax
It is considered that the entity is a non-profit association that meets the requirements of item 8.2(c) of the table in section 50-40 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and its ordinary and statutory income is exempt from income tax under section 50-1 of the ITAA 1997.
Question 1
Is the total ordinary income and statutory income of the entity exempt from income tax under section 50-1 of the ITAA 1997?
Answer
Yes
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2012
Year ended 30 June 2013
Year ended 30 June 2014
Year ended 30 June 2015
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2011
Relevant facts and circumstances
The entity operates as a public company limited by guarantee. The powers of the entity are set out in its Constitution as amended.
The applicant states that for all years up to and including 30 June 2011 the entity has self-assessed its status as an income tax exempt body.
The entity has appropriate non-profit and dissolution clauses within its Constitution.
The entity's training arm is a registered business name of the entity. The training arm has its own website. It is used only for providing training courses in the entity's operations.
The entity's main income streams are:
Subscription fees;
Entity magazine;
Licensing fees;
Sale of reference material;
Training for the industry;
Conference income;
Interest from surplus cash on deposit.
You have advised that these facts will remain consistent for the ruling period.
Relevant legislative provisions
50-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
50-40 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
Reasons for decision
Under section 50-1 of the ITAA 1997 the ordinary and statutory income of entities covered by the tables in sections 50-5 to 50-45 is exempt from income tax. The appropriate section for consideration in this ruling is item 8.2(c) of the table in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997.
Item 8.2(c) of the table in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997 states the following as being an exempt entity:
A society or association established for the purpose of promoting the development of any of the following Australian resources:
a) agricultural resources;
b) horticultural resources;
c) industrial resources;
d) manufacturing resources;
e) pastoral resources;
f) viticultural resources;
g) aquacultural resources;
h) fishing resources.
The special condition of the section is that the society or association is not carried on for the profit or gain of its individual members.
The entity has applied for consideration as a society or association established for the purpose of promoting the development of Australian industrial resources.
The conditions of section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997 are discussed below:
1. It must be a society or association.
The term society, association or club is not defined in the ITAA 1997. The term is therefore construed according to the ordinary meaning of the words.
In Theosophical Foundation Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) [1966] 67 SR (NSW), Sugerman JA defines society at 82:
A society, in the relevant sense, is a number of persons associated together by some common interest or purpose, united by a common vow, holding the same belief or opinion, following the same trade or profession, etc; an association
The meaning of "society" as the Oxford English Dictionary definition shows can be the equivalent of "association" and I do not think that any relevant distinction in nature exists between the two. It merely seems to have happened that some organisations are called "associations", others are called "societies" but no meaningful difference can be detected between the two.
Paragraph 2 of Taxation Determination TD 95/56 considers the definition of 'association' as follows:
…The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary defines the term 'association' to be 'a body of persons associated for a common purpose; the organisation formed to effect their purpose'. The Macquarie Dictionary defines 'association' as being 'an organisation of people with a common purpose and having a formal structure'. Olsson J, in Quinton v. South Australian Psychological Board (1985) 38 SASR 523, also stated that the term 'association' has come to be regarded as attaching to a body of persons associated for a common purpose.
The Macquarie Dictionary 2001, 5th edition (The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, Macquarie University) defines 'club' as a group of persons organised for a social, literary, sporting, political, or other purpose, regulated by rules agreed by its members.
The interpretations of society, association or club as described above, emphasise on a 'body of persons' and 'an organisation of people' with a 'common purpose'. The entity is a company limited by guarantee, an organisation of people with a common purpose (as per its objects) and a formal structure. The entity is considered to be a society or association.
2. It must be established for the purpose of promoting the development of Australian industrial resources.
The term 'development' is used in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997 in a commercial or business sense. It comprehends all the elements which must be taken into account to ensure that the specified resources are best used.
The meaning of 'development' was examined by the High Court in the case of FC of T v. Broken Hill Pty Co. Ltd 69 ATC 4028; 1ATR 40 where, in considering the phrase 'development of mining property' the majority of the High Court accepted the interpretation of Kitto J:
In its ordinary English sense the word 'development' when used in relation to a property refers to the unfolding, the bringing out, of some latent capability of that property…It covers I think, any preparation, adaption or equipment of the property for the exploration of an inherent potentiality which cannot be exploited or fully exploited, without some such preliminary treatment.
The promotion of development may be direct or indirect. Methods of promoting resources include marketing, training, research, education, introduction of new and improved classes of product and facilitation of cooperation, and similar activities (refer page 22 of the Income tax guide for non-profit organisations).
The concept of industrial resources is considered in Taxation Ruling IT 2415 Income Tax: Associations Promoting Development of Australian Resources (IT 2415). At paragraph 6 of IT 2415 it is stated:
6. ..... the Court concluded that the expression "industrial resources" in paragraph 23(h) refers to resources such as those of the building, mining, quarrying, shipping and transport industries - it does not extend to business or commercial resources or resources of the kind promoted by the Association.
The entity, as set out in its Constitution and incorporating the activities of its training arm, is established to promote resources in Australia. We now will consider if the resources qualify as industrial resources of Australia.
Resources of the relevant industry were accepted as industrial resources by Sheppard J in Australian Insurance Association v. FC of T 79 ATC 4569 (Australian Insurance Association).
Based upon the above discussion, it is accepted that the entity has a purpose to promote the development of Australian industrial resources. To qualify for exemption under item 8.2(c) of the table in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997, that purpose must be the dominant purpose for which the association was established. Therefore, both the entity's dominant objects as per its Constitution and its dominant activity must be for this purpose.
All of the entity's objects listed are for the purpose of developing and supporting the industry. This is achieved by representation of its member organisations, advancement of professional standards, and training and development to ensure acceptable operational standards are met in the industry. In addition, the entity provides training on its services. In accordance with paragraphs 9 and 10 of IT 2415 industry training is an acceptable activity for purposes of promotion of a specified resource of Australia, in this case industrial resources of Australia.
It is accepted that the entity is established principally for the purpose of promoting the development of Australian industrial resources.
Special Condition.
The entity must not be carried on for the profit or gain of its individual members.
Where an association operates principally to confer benefits to its members jointly or as a group, it is unlikely to be predominantly for promotion of resource development and therefore not exempt from income tax under item 8.2(c) of section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997. If an association is carried on for the profit or gain of its individual members, it will fail the non-profit requirement. Such a purpose is unlikely to be consistent with the purpose of promoting resource development. It is necessary to distinguish from the dominant purpose of providing benefits to members as a group from the incidental benefit which will often flow to members from activities promoting the development of resources with which they are involved.
An association usually ensures they operate on a non-profit basis by including non-profit clauses in their constituent documents. It is considered that the entity has acceptable non-profit clauses in its Constitution.
It is also necessary that the association's actions are consistent with their constituent documents. As the cases below illustrate, there are instances where benefits to members have been accepted. However, what is important to distinguish is whether benefits are conferred to members along with others in the community or as individual members.
The phrase 'profit or gain of its individual members' was considered in the case Commissioner of Taxation v Co-operative Bulk Handling limited [2010] FCAFC 155 (CBH case). In the CBH case, the members had to be customers of CBH. However, CBH's services were not restricted to members; non-members could also contract for CBH's bulk handling services. It was held that CBH made its facilities available to any grain trader or miller, whether or not they were members. Further, it was held at 112:
While members do benefit from the activities of CBH, in its grain handling and storage activities, they do so at no greater extent than, and have no preference over, non-members who deal with the company, and on these circumstances such benefits do not accrue to them as 'individual members'.
From the information provided the members of the entity do receive benefits. However, apart from general training and advice on the latest industry trends and techniques, members do not appear to benefit to a greater extent than non-members. Therefore the benefits provided to members do not accrue to them as 'individual members'.
However, benefits which are received jointly as members and are incidental to the pursuit of the association's objects will not prevent it from passing the non-profit test. For example business members will commonly receive some advantages, including financial advantages, as an incidental result of resource development (Australian Insurance Association case).
In the case of Inland Revenue Commissioners v Yorkshire Agricultural Society (1928) 1 KB 611 (Yorkshire Agricultural case) the provision of specific benefits to members to induce membership were disregarded. Although the Society applied as a charitable institution, it was found that the benefits to the members in the form of various privileges attaching to membership could be disregarded. The fact that benefits accrued to members of the Society did not detract from the fact that the Society had been established for the purpose of improvement of agriculture as a whole and not for any confined purpose of benefiting only the particular members of the Society. His Lordship said at 631:
…If the benefit given to members is only given to them with a view of giving encouragement and carrying out the main purpose which is a charitable purpose, then I think the mere fact that the members are benefited in the course of promoting the charitable purpose would not prevent the society being established for charitable purposes only.
It can be seen from the entity's website and information provided that member benefits are designed to add to the member's industry knowledge and assist them to learn the latest industry trends and methods by way of conferences, training and newsletters. These benefits are directly related to the greater purpose of promoting their industry as a whole, an industrial resource of Australia. It is not considered that the entity exists principally to confer benefits on its members.
Conclusion
It is considered that the entity is a non-profit association that meets the requirements of item 8.2(c) of the table in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997 and its ordinary and statutory income is exempt from income tax under section 50-1 of the ITAA 1997.