Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012437469673
Ruling
Subject: In-house fringe benefits - salary sacrifice arrangements
Question 1
Will the reimbursement of an employee's expense be an in-house fringe benefit?
Answer
Yes.
Question 2
Will an in-house fringe benefit arise when you pay part or all of an employee's expenses?
Answer
Yes.
Question 3
Will the taxable value of the fringe benefits that arise from:
(a) the reimbursement of an employee's expenses; or
(b) the payment of an employee's expenses;
be calculated under section 48 of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)?
Answer
(a) No. The taxable value will be calculated under subsection 22A(2) of the FBTAA. However, subsection 22A(2) uses the calculation method contained in section 48 of the FBTAA.
(b) No. The taxable value will be calculated under subsection 22A(2) of the FBTAA. However, subsection 22A(2) uses the calculation method contained in section 48 of the FBTAA.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
1 April 2012 - 31 March 2013
1 April 2013 - 31 March 2014.
NOTE:
This ruling is based on the in-house fringe benefit provisions that are currently contained in the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA). As part of the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook 2012-13, the Treasurer announced that the government will remove the concessional fringe benefits tax treatment for in-house fringe benefits if they are accessed by way of a salary sacrifice arrangement.
The relevant amendments are contained within Tax Laws Amendment (2012 Measures No. 6) Bill 2012 which was introduced into Parliament on 29 November 2012.
If enacted, these proposed reforms will apply in relation to benefits provided on or after 22 October 2012 unless the benefit is provided under a salary packaging arrangement that is covered by the transitional arrangements. Under the transitional arrangements, the existing provisions will continue to apply to a benefit provided before 1 April 2014 under a salary packaging arrangement entered into by the employer and employee before 22 October 2012, unless the salary packaging arrangement is materially altered or varied.
If the law is substantively changed, the part of the private ruling dealing with the changed law will cease to apply.
Further information regarding the proposed reforms can be obtained from The Treasury website at http://www.treasury.gov.au?Policy-Topics/Taxation/In-House-Fringe-Benefits.
The scheme commenced on:
1 April 2012.
Relevant facts and circumstances
This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.
You intend to offer your employees an opportunity to enter into an effective salary sacrifice arrangement in relation to charges.
The amount specified in the salary sacrifice arrangement is used to calculate a fortnightly amount which is paid into a sundry debtor account.
Depending upon the particular arrangement the amount in the sundry debtor account may be used to:
· reimburse the employee; or
· make a payment to another corporation in relation to the employee's account.
Any balance remaining in the sundry debtor account at the time the employee ceases his or her employment will be paid to the employee via the payroll system.
There are two alternative arrangements that can be entered into.
Arrangement 1 - reimbursement of charges raised by associated company
Under this arrangement an employee will enter into an effective salary sacrifice arrangement for the reimbursement of the employee's charges.
The reimbursement will not occur until the employee provides you with either a receipt printout or Bpay reference number showing the amount paid and date of payment.
Arrangement 2 - the payment of the charges raised by associated company
Under this arrangement an employee will enter into an effective salary sacrifice arrangement for the payment of the employee's account.
The payment will not occur until the employee provides the account to you.
Relevant legislative provisions
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 20
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 22A(2
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 45
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 46
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 48
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 49
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 62
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 136(1)
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 149
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 153
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 159
Reasons for decision
Question 1
Will the reimbursement of charges be an in-house fringe benefit?
An in-house fringe benefit is defined in subsection 136(1) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) to mean:
(a) an in-house expense payment fringe benefit;
(b) an in-house property fringe benefit; or
(c) an in-house residual fringe benefit.
Under the first arrangement you will reimburse an employee for the amount shown on account.
In determining whether this reimbursement will be an in-house benefit it is necessary to determine what kind of benefit will be provided as there are only three types of benefit that can be an in-house fringe benefit; namely an expense payment fringe benefit, a property fringe benefit and a residual fringe benefit.
In general terms, section 20 of the FBTAA provides that an expense payment fringe benefit will arise where an employer either:
· makes a payment to a third party to discharge an obligation of an employee, or
· reimburses the employee for expenses incurred by the employee.
As you intend to reimburse expenditure incurred by an employee, the benefit will be an expense payment fringe benefit.
Is the expense payment fringe benefit an in-house expense payment fringe benefit?
Subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA defines an in-house expense payment fringe benefit as:
(a) an in-house property expense payment fringe benefit; or
(b) an in-house residual expense payment fringe benefit.
Both of these terms are defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA. In broad terms:
· an in-house property expense payment fringe benefit refers to an expense payment fringe benefit where the expenditure incurred by the employee was in respect of the purchase of tangible property of a kind sold by the provider in the ordinary course of business; and
· an in-house residual expense payment fringe benefit refers to an expense payment fringe benefit where the expenditure incurred by the employee was in respect of the purchase of a service or other residual benefit of a kind supplied by the provider to members of the public in the ordinary course of business.
In your situation, you are providing one benefit (a reimbursement) which relates to both the provision of property and a residual benefit. This will be a residual benefit under section 153 of the FBTAA.
Will the reimbursement be an 'in-house residual expense payment fringe benefit'?
Subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA defines an in-house residual expense payment fringe benefit to mean:
an expense payment fringe benefit in relation to an employer where:
(a) the recipients expenditure was incurred in respect of the provision of a residual benefit (other than a benefit provided under a contract of investment insurance) by a person (in this definition called the "residual benefit provider");
(b) if the residual benefit provider is the employer or an associate of the employer - at or about the time that, if the residual benefit had been a residual fringe benefit, would have been the comparison time, the residual benefit provider carried on a business that consisted of or included the provision of identical or similar benefits principally to outsiders;
(c) if the residual benefit provider is not the employer or an associate of the employer:
(i) the residual benefit provider purchased the benefit from the employer or associate of the employer (which employer or associate is in this definition called the "seller"; and
(ii) at or about the time that, if the residual benefit had been a residual fringe benefit, would have been the comparison time, both the residual benefit provider and the seller carried on business that consisted of or included the provision of identical or similar benefits principally to outsiders: and
(d) documentary evidence of the recipients' expenditure is obtained by the recipient and that documentary evidence, or a copy, is given to the employer before the declaration date.
Therefore an 'in-house residual expense payment fringe benefit' requires that:
(i) The fringe benefit is an 'expense payment fringe benefit';
(ii) The employee's (or associate's) expenditure is incurred on the provision of a residual benefit (other than a benefit provided under a contract of investment insurance);
(iii) Either:
· the residual benefit provider is the employer or the employer's associate who carried on a business that consisted of, or included, the provision of identical or similar benefits principally to outsiders; or
· if the residual benefit is not the employer or the employer's associate, the provider purchased the benefit from the employer or the employer's associate and both the residual benefit provider and the employer or the employer's associate carried on a business that consisted of, or included, the provision of identical or similar benefits principally to outsiders.
(iv) The required documentary evidence is given to the employer at the required time.
These criteria are discussed below.
(i) Will the fringe benefit be an expense payment fringe benefit?
As discussed above, the reimbursement will be an expense payment fringe benefit.
(ii) Will the expenditure be incurred on the provision of a residual benefit?
As discussed above, the expenditure will be incurred on the provision of a residual benefit.
(iii) Is the provider of the residual benefit the employer or an associate of the employer that carries on a business that consists of or includes the provision of identical or similar benefits principally to outsiders?
On the basis of the information provided it is accepted the provider of the residual benefits:
· is your associate;
· carries on a business that consists of or includes the provision of identical or similar benefits; and
· provides the benefits principally to outsiders.
(iv) Will the required documentary evidence be given to the employer at the required time?
This condition will be met as a reimbursement will not be paid until the employee provides you with either a receipt printout or Bpay reference number showing the amount paid and date of payment.
Conclusion
As all the conditions will be satisfied the reimbursement of an employee's expenses will be an in-house residual expense payment fringe benefit.
Question 2
Will an in-house fringe benefit arise when you pay part or all of an employee's account?
In the second arrangement, you will pay part or all of the expenses incurred by the employee in relation to the services.
As discussed above, an expense payment fringe benefit will arise under section 20 of the FBTAA where you either
· make a payment to a third party to discharge an obligation of an employee, or
· reimburse the employee for expenses incurred by the employee.
The payment of all or part of the debt due on an employee's account comes within the first dot point as you will be paying a third party to discharge an obligation incurred by the employee. Therefore, it will be an expense payment fringe benefit.
The definition of in-house expense payment fringe benefit was discussed above in relation to question 1. In accordance with that discussion, the payment will be an in-house residual expense payment fringe benefit as:
· the payment is for the provision of a residual benefit as it is for the provision of both property and a residual benefit;
· the residual benefit provider is an associate of the employer; and
· the residual benefit provider carries on a business that consists of or includes the provision of identical or similar benefits principally to outsiders.
Question 3
Will the taxable value of the fringe benefits be calculated under section 48 of the FBTAA?
As discussed above the arrangements will involve the provision of an in-house residual expense payment fringe benefit.
Subsection 22A(2) of the FBTAA provides the valuation method for calculating the taxable value of an in-house residual expense payment fringe benefit.
Subsection 22A(2) states:
Subject this Part, the taxable value in relation to a year of tax of an in-house residual expense payment fringe benefit (in this subsection called the "actual fringe benefit") provided during the year of tax is the amount that, if:
(a) the provision of the residual benefit to which the actual fringe benefit relates were an in-house residual fringe benefit (in this subsection called the "notional fringe benefit"); and
(b) the recipients contribution in relation to the notional fringe benefit were equal to the recipients expenditure reduced by whichever of the following amounts is applicable;
(i) the amount of the payment referred to in paragraph 20(a) reduced by the amount of the recipients contribution in relation to the actual fringe benefit;
(ii) the amount of the reimbursement referred to in paragraph 20(b);
would have been calculated under whichever of sections 48 and 49 is applicable as the taxable value but for section 52 and Division 14, of the notional fringe benefit in relation to the year of tax.
In calculating what would have been the taxable value if the benefit had been a residual benefit the valuation rules in section 48 are used where the benefit is a non-period benefit. If the benefit is a period benefit the valuation rules in section 49 are used.
As the benefit is provided at the time when the payment in respect of that period is due and payable the benefit is a non-period residual benefit.
Therefore, the relevant section for the purpose of using subsection 22A(2) to calculate the taxable value of the in-house residual expense payment fringe benefits will be section 48.