Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012466344858
Ruling
Subject: CGT - Small business concessions extension of time
Question 1
Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion under subsection 104-190(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to extend the replacement asset period by six months?
Answer
Yes
This ruling applies for the following periods
Year ended 30 June 2013
Year ended 30 June 2014
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2012
Relevant facts and circumstances
You sold a CGT asset under Contract for Sale dated year ended 30 June 2011.
A condition of the sale was that you agreed to a minimum two year term of continual employment, managing the business for the purchaser, and a restraint of trade which precluded you from seeking new business ventures within the two year period.
Your replacement asset period ended in year ended 30 June 2013.
Your restraint of trade clause and period of employment for the purchaser prevented you from acquiring a competing business.
A breach of the restraint of trade clause attracted a penalty of X% of the sale proceeds.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 104-190(2)
Reasons for decision
Detailed reasoning
In order to apply the small business rollover, a replacement asset must be acquired within two years after the relevant CGT event. However the Commissioner may extend the replacement asset period in certain circumstances (subsection 104-190(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997).
The relevant factors in determining whether to extend the replacement asset period are:
· there should be evidence of an acceptable explanation for the period of extension requested and that it would be fair and equitable in the circumstances to provide such an extension
· account must be had to any prejudice to the Commissioner which may result from the additional time being allowed, however the mere absence of prejudice is not enough to justify the granting of an extension
· account must be had of any unsettling of people, other than the Commissioner, or of established practices
· there must be a consideration of fairness to people in like positions and the wider public interest
· whether there is any mischief involved
· a consideration of the consequences.
You disposed of your business in the relevant year. Due to the requirement for you to manage the business for the purchaser for a period of two years, following the sale, and the inclusion of a restraint of trade clause for the two years following the sale, you have been unable to purchase a replacement asset.
Having considered the relevant factors above, and the particular circumstances of your case, the Commissioner has applied his discretion and will extend the asset replacement period by six months.