| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012466759464
Ruling
Subject: Capital gains tax - marriage breakdown and disposal of property
Question: Are you liable for capital gains tax (CGT) on the disposal of the property?
Answer: No.
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2013
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2012
Relevant facts and circumstances
This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.
Approximately six years ago you purchased an investment property for $X.
You were the director of a company.
The following year the property was signed over to your former spouse, as part of a binding financial agreement (the agreement) between you and your former spouse.
At the time of transfer the property was valued at $X.
Under the agreement you signed over the company directorship to your former spouse.
The following year the property ceased to be an investment property.
Renovations were undertaken with funds provided by an additional mortgage taken out in joint names.
The property was the only property you and your former spouse owned.
Approximately three months later you and your former spouse moved in and established the property as your main residence.
Approximately two years later as the result of your marriage breakdown, your former spouse moved out of the property.
You continued to reside in the property until its disposal.
Early last year following your former spouse's refusal to dispose of the property as required by a new binding financial agreement between you and your former spouse, a federal magistrate ordered that the property be disposed of.
Later in the year the property was sold as directed under the court order for $X.
Early this year the Australian Security and Investments Commission de-registered the company.
A month later a federal magistrate ordered the equity from the disposal of the property be transferred to you.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 102-20
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10
Reasons for decision
While these reasons are not part of the private ruling, we provide them to help you to understand how we reached our decision.
CGT is the tax you pay on certain gains you make. You make a capital gain or a capital loss as a result of a CGT event happening to an asset in which you have an ownership interest.
You have an ownership interest in a property if:
· you have a legal or equitable interest in the land which the dwelling is erected upon; and
· you have a right or licence to occupy the dwelling.
In your case, you do not have an ownership in the property at the time of its disposal as the property was transferred to your former spouse as part of the agreement.
Therefore, you are not liable for the capital gain or capital loss made on the disposal of the property.
Note: The marriage breakdown rollover provisions do not apply where you do not have an ownership interest in a property.