| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012490468141
Ruling
Subject: Work related expenses - meals
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for expenses incurred dining in restaurants?
Answer
No
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2012
Year ending 30 June 2013
The scheme commenced on:
1 July 2011
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are employed in the food industry.
As a part of your employment you are also involved in the purchasing for the company.
You undertake research by acting as a consumer to find out and taste what competitors are selling in retail shops and restaurants.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income, except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income.
In establishing a connection, it must be shown that the outgoing is relevant and incidental to the gaining of assessable income.
In most circumstances the expense of dining in a restaurant would be considered a private expense. In some limited circumstances this expense may be characterised as an income producing expense and may be an allowable deduction. However there is an onus on the taxpayer to prove that such an outlay should be an allowable deduction.
This was highlighted in Case P30 25 CTBR (NS); Case 94 82 ATC 139 when the Board of review disallowed a claim for the purchase of newspapers by a real estate salesman. The real estate salesperson would gather information from the daily papers to assist him in selling real estate. The salesperson was however, unable to demonstrate that his income was affected by expenditure on the newspapers. The expense retained its private character and the deduction was not allowed.
In considering Case R113 84 ATC 750, where the taxpayer was a sales manager for an airline, the Board of Review disallowed a deduction for costs associated with overseas travel. In making this decision Member P. M. Roach made the following comment:
One can well understand the proposition that travel experience is of advantage to a salesman of tour and travel services, just as experience of drinking whiskey may be of advantage to a salesman of whisky. But it does not follow for the whisky vendor that all expenditure he incurs relating to his consumption of whisky lacks any private character.
In your case knowledge acquired from dining in restaurants may assist you to carry out employment duties more efficiently. However, the expense is not necessarily incurred in order to earn that income. The cost of dining in restaurants has the character of a private expense. The connection is too general or tenuous to allow a deduction for any portion of the cost. Accordingly you are not entitled to a deduction under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.