| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012515863357
Ruling
Subject: Legal expenses
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for legal expenses?
Answer
Yes
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2013
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2012
Relevant facts
You were charged with a criminal offence, which arose from a complaint made against you whilst in the execution of your duty.
You enlisted the services of a senior council as the charges put before the court were serious and required experienced and proven council.
You were found guilty and convicted of the offence.
You lodged an appeal which was granted and heard.
The matter was found not proven and as such all your grounds for appeal were successful and all charges dismissed after being found not guilty.
You incurred legal expenses in relation to these charges.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 provides that a loss or an outgoing is an allowable deduction if it is incurred in producing assessable income or in carrying on a business for the production of assessable income unless that loss or outgoing is capital or of a private or domestic nature.
The courts on a number of occasions have determined legal expenses to be an allowable deduction if the expenses arise out of the day to day activities of the taxpayer's business. The action out of which the legal expense arises has to have more than a peripheral connection to the taxpayer's business and the expense may arise out of litigation concerning the taxpayer's professional conduct.
In FC of T v Rowe (1995) 31 ATR 392; 95 ATC 4691, an employee incurred legal expenses in defending the manner in which he performed his employment duties. The court accepted that such expenses were allowable and no significance was placed on the taxpayer's status as an employee.
In your case, it is accepted that you were required to defend the way in which you discharged your employment duties. Consequently you are entitled to a deduction for legal expenses relating to this defence.