Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012523008335

Ruling

Subject: NCL Commissioner's discretion - lead time

Question

Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your business activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 2012-13 financial year?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2013

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2007

Relevant facts

You satisfy the less than $250,000 income requirement set out in subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997.

You have stated that you commenced your business activity on 1 July 200X.

You are an artist in the music industry.

Your band plans to independently record and release recordings.

Expenses for the relevant financial year were for: mixing and recording; mastering; CD printing; promotion and media releases; flights.

You believe you are now in a position to book and promote a national tour for subsequent year.

To meet the $20,000 assessable income test the band must tour nationally.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2E)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 35-55(1)(b)

Reasons for decision

For the 2009-10 and later financial years, Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless:

· you meet the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests;

· the exceptions apply; or

· the Commissioner exercises his discretion.

In your situation, none of the exceptions would apply and although you satisfy the income requirement, you do not meet any of the four tests in the year of income under consideration. Your losses are therefore subject to the deferral rule, unless the Commissioner exercises his discretion.

The relevant discretion may be exercised for the income year in question where:

· it is in the nature of the business activity that there will be a period of time before it can be expected to pass one of the four tests; and

· there is an objective expectation your business activity will produce a tax profit or meet one of the four tests within a commercially viable period for your industry.

Having regard to your full circumstances, it is not accepted that it is in the nature of the business activity that has prevented one of the four tests being passed. You commenced the activity on 1 July 200X and would have derived income for a period of five years.

This discretion is intended to cover a business activity where there is an inherent period of time between the commencement of the activity and the production of assessable income. For example, an activity involving the planting of hardwood trees for harvest, where many years would pass before the activity could reasonably be expected to produce income.

The legislation does not support any view that the discretion should be exercised for any start-up activity that is yet, for example, to satisfy the assessable income test in section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997, simply because of the small scale on which it was started, or because a client base is being built up.

We do not consider that there is a lead time between the commencement of your activity and the production of any assessable income. Your business was able to generate income from professional fees in your first financial year in operation. Therefore we do not consider that there is anything inherent or innate in the nature of your business activity that it has not yet been able to satisfy one of the tests. Your activity is of a type that is able to produce assessable income quite soon after its commencement.