| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012523492431
Ruling
Subject: Legal expenses
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for the legal expenses incurred?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2013
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2012
Relevant facts and circumstances
You were offered a role in a newly established venture.
You were required to think about the offer received and report back with any possible amendments/suggestions/negotiations before finalising the employment contract.
You consulted a legal practitioner to help you understand different legal and tax implications and gain in depth knowledge on relevant commission and pay structure schemes.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income, except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income.
For legal expenses to constitute an allowable deduction it must be shown that they were incidental and relevant to the production of the taxpayer's assessable income (Ronpibon Tin NL & Tong Kah Compound NL v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 47; (1949) 4 AITR 236; (1949) 8 ATD 431).
The nature of the expenditure must also be considered (Hallstroms Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1946) 72 CLR 634; (1946) 8 ATD 190). The nature or character of the legal expense follows the advantage that is sought to be gained by incurring the expenses. If the advantage to be gained is of a capital nature, then the expense incurred in gaining the advantage will also be of a capital nature.
Taxation Ruling TR 2000/5 sets out the Commissioner's view of the application of section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 to costs incurred by employees and employers in preparing and administering employment agreements. TR 2000/5 states that a deduction is not allowable for the costs of drawing up an employment agreement with a new employer as the expenses are incurred at a point too soon to be considered as being incurred in the production of assessable income and, further, it is a capital expense.
In your case you incurred legal expenses in relation to drawing up a new employment agreement with a newly established venture. As stated in TR 2000/5, these expenses are considered to be incurred at a point too soon to be incurred in the production of your assessable income and are also capital in nature. Therefore, you are not entitled to a deduction for these expenses under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.