Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012550000338
Ruling
Subject: Tax offset - medical expenses
Question
Do the costs of your surgery qualify as eligible medical expenses for the purposes of the medical expenses tax offset?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 2013
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2012
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are a single person with an adjusted taxable income below $84,000 for the 2013 financial year.
Your General Practitioner advised that you undergo surgery to reduce your back pain and as a means of preventing any further back problems.
You had the surgery which cost you $X.
A portion of the total expense was refunded to you from Medicare.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 159P
Reasons for decision
A medical expenses tax offset is available to a taxpayer under section 159P of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) where the taxpayer incurs medical expenses in an income year for themselves or a dependant who is an Australian resident. The medical expenses tax offset is 20% of the amount by which the net medical expenses exceed $2,120 for the 2012-13 income year.
Net medical expenses are the medical expenses a taxpayer has paid less any refunds they received, or could have received, from Medicare or a private health fund.
Payments to legally qualified medical practitioners, nurses or chemists in respect of an illness or an operation qualify as rebatable medical expenses. However, from the 2005/06 year, payments for solely cosmetic operations for which no Medicare benefit is payable are ineligible.
To determine whether a procedure is cosmetic in nature, the ordinary definition of cosmetic applies. The Macquarie dictionary defines cosmetic as:
· serving to beautify, imparting or improving beauty, especially of the complexion; or
· designed to effect a superficial alteration while keeping the basis unchanged.
To determine if an expense is an ineligible medical expense for medical expenses tax offset purposes two factors have to be considered:
· is the procedure cosmetic in nature according to the ordinary definition of cosmetic; and
· if the procedure is cosmetic, is a Medicare benefit payable?
In your case, you have had surgery to reduce your back pain and prevent further problems from occurring. It is considered, that whilst the surgery may have had some cosmetic effect, the primary reason was to alleviate prolonged and intense back pain.
Accordingly, you are entitled to include the costs of the surgery in the calculation of your medical expenses tax offset.