| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012554377627
Ruling
Subject: Deduction for health insurance
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for private health insurance?
Answer
No
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2013
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2012
Relevant facts
You arrived in Australia on a visa.
You are earning assessable income in Australia.
You are not eligible for Medicare.
It is a requirement of your visa that you have adequate health insurance.
You pay a monthly premium to a health fund for this cover.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income, except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income.
The courts have considered the meaning of 'incurred in gaining or producing assessable income'. In Ronpibon Tin NL Tong Kah Compound NL v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 47; 56 ALR 785; 8 ATD 431 the High Court stated that:
For expenditure to form an allowable deduction as an outgoing incurred in gaining or producing assessable it must be incidental and relevant to that end. The words incurred in gaining or producing the assessable income mean in the course of gaining or producing such income.
It is a long standing principle that a taxpayer does not satisfy section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 merely by demonstrating a casual connection between the expenditure and the derivation of income. What must be shown is a closer and more immediate connection. The expenditure must be incurred in gaining or producing your assessable income (Lunney v. Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 100 CLR 478). These principles have been affirmed by the High Court in Commissioner of Taxation v. Payne HCA 3.
In Taxation Determination TD 93/22, a professional sportsman was not entitled to a deduction for contributions to a private health fund, even though it was a condition of the employment that the person takes out the insurance. The cost of private health insurance was considered not to be sufficiently connected to the sporting activities that produced that income and was also a private expense.
Similarly in your case, you were required to take out health insurance under the terms of your visa. It is acknowledged that taking out the health insurance was not strictly a personal choice as it is a requirement in order to enter Australia. This does not mean that the expense is necessarily deductible.
The expenses incurred for the health insurance have no direct connection to the gaining or producing of your assessable income. The purpose of the expense is to cover you in case of an illness while you are in Australia. There is insufficient connection to the gaining or production of your assessable income for a deduction to be allowed as the expenditure is too remote. In addition, contributions for private health insurance can be characterised as being of a private nature.
Therefore, you are not entitled to a deduction for contributions for health insurance under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.