Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012554999092

Ruling

Subject: Assessability of lump sum payment from a foreign pension fund

Question 1

Is any part of the lump sum payment received from a foreign pension scheme assessable as applicable fund earnings?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ending 30 June 2013

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

You were a member of a foreign pension scheme.

You joined the scheme a while ago.

You have ceased membership with the scheme.

You provided the value of your interest in the scheme before migrating to Australia.

You migrated to Australia more than 20 years ago.

You lodged your first income tax return, stating that you were an Australian resident for the entire income year.

You were assessed as an Australian resident for that entire income year and your taxable income was taxed at Australian resident rates.

You lodged your income tax return for the following income year stating that you were an Australian resident for the entire income year.

You were also assessed as an Australian resident for this entire income year and your taxable income in that year was taxed at Australian resident rates.

You treated yourself as an Australian resident for income tax purposes from the beginning of that first income year.

You were subsequently permitted to remain in Australia indefinitely.

The foreign pension scheme awarded you a service pension in the 2012-13 income year.

The foreign pension scheme also awarded you a lump sum payment in the 2012-13 income year, which was subsequently paid in that same income year.

The foreign pension scheme was unable to provide a value of the lump sum payment at the time of Australian residency for income tax purposes.

Assumption(s)

The annual rate of growth of your interest in the foreign pension scheme has been calculated. The Commissioner considers it reasonable to assume the same rate applied between the date you became a resident of Australian for income tax purposes to the date of payment.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 6-5(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 6-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 6-10(4)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 295-95(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 305-70

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 305-70(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 305-75

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 305-75(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 305-75 (3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 305-75 (5)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 305-75 (6)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 306-70

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 960-50(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 960-50(4)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1)

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 Section 10

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 Section 19

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 Section 62

Reasons for decision

Summary

The 'applicable fund earnings' in respect of the lump sum payment you received has been calculated.

Consequently, this amount is to be included in your assessable income for the 2012-13 income year.

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 6-5(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that the assessable income of a resident taxpayer includes ordinary income derived directly or indirectly from all sources, whether in or out of Australia, during the income year.

Section 6-10 of the ITAA 1997 provides that a taxpayer's assessable income includes statutory income amounts that are not ordinary income but are included in assessable income by another provision. The assessable income of an Australian resident includes statutory income from all sources, whether in or out of Australia (subsection 6-10(4) of the ITAA 1997).

Under section 305-70 of the ITAA 1997 any applicable funds earnings in relation to a lump sum payment from a foreign superannuation fund, that is received more than six months after a person has become an Australian resident, is assessable income.

Therefore, any applicable fund earnings in relation to the lump sum payment you received from the foreign pension scheme is bought to account as statutory income and is to be included in your assessable income for the relevant financial year.

Lump sum payments transferred from foreign superannuation funds

The applicable fund earnings in relation to a lump sum payment from a foreign superannuation fund, that is received more than six months after a person has become an Australian resident, will be assessable under section 305-70 of the ITAA 1997.

The applicable fund earnings is subject to tax at the person's marginal rate. The remainder of the lump sum payment is not assessable income and is not exempt income.

The applicable fund earnings is the amount worked out under either subsection 305-75(2) or (3) of the ITAA 1997. Subsection 305-75(2) applies where the person was an Australian resident at all times during the period to which the lump sum relates. Subsection 305-75(3) applies where the person was not an Australian resident at all times during the period to which the lump sum relates.

Before determining whether an amount is assessable under section 305-70 of the ITAA 1997, it is necessary to ascertain whether the payment is being made from a foreign superannuation fund. If the entity making the payment is not a foreign superannuation fund, then section 305-70 will not have any application.

Foreign superannuation fund

A foreign superannuation fund is defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 as follows:

(a) a superannuation fund is a foreign superannuation fund at a time if the fund is not an Australian superannuation fund at that time; and

(b) a superannuation fund is a foreign superannuation fund for an income year if the fund is not an Australian superannuation fund for the income year.

Under the definition of Australian superannuation fund in subsection 295-95(2) of the ITAA 1997 a superannuation fund that is established outside of Australia and has its central management and control outside of Australia would qualify as a foreign superannuation fund. The fact that some of its members may be Australian residents would not necessarily alter this.

However, part of the definition of a foreign superannuation fund also requires consideration of what constitutes a superannuation or retirement fund.

Provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund

The High Court examined both the terms superannuation fund and fund in Scott v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (No. 2) (1966) 10 AITR 290; (1966) 40 ALJR 265; (1966) 14 ATD 333 (Scott). In that case, Justice Windeyer stated:

…I have come to the conclusion that there is no essential single attribute of a superannuation fund established for the benefit of employees except that it must be a fund bona fide devoted as its sole purpose to providing for employees who are participants money benefits (or benefits having a monetary value) upon their reaching a prescribed age. In this connexion "fund", I take it, ordinarily means money (or investments) set aside and invested, the surplus income therefrom being capitalised. I do not put this forward as a definition, but rather as a general description.

The issue of what constitutes a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund was discussed by the Full Bench of the High Court in Mahony v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1967) 41 ALJR 232; (1967) 14 ATD 519 (Mahony). In that case, Justice Kitto held that a fund had to exclusively be a 'provident, benefit or superannuation fund' and that 'connoted a purpose narrower than the purpose of conferring benefits in a completely general sense…' This narrower purpose meant that the benefits had to be 'characterised by some specific future purpose' such as the example given by Justice Kitto of a funeral benefit.

Furthermore, Justice Kitto's judgement indicated that a fund does not satisfy any of the three provisions, that is, 'provident, benefit or superannuation fund', if there exist provisions for the payment of benefits 'for any other reason whatsoever'. In other words, though a fund may contain provisions for retirement purposes, it could not be accepted as a superannuation fund if it contained provisions that benefits could be paid in circumstances other than those relating to retirement.

In section 62 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), a regulated superannuation fund must be 'maintained solely' for the 'core purposes' of providing benefits to a member when the events occur:

    · on or after retirement from gainful employment; or

    · attaining a prescribed age; and

    · on the member's death (this may require the benefits being passed on to a member's dependants or legal representative).

Notwithstanding the SIS Act applies only to 'regulated superannuation funds' (as defined in section 19 of the SIS Act), and foreign superannuation funds do not qualify as regulated superannuation funds as they are established and operate outside Australia, the Commissioner views the SIS Act (and the SIS Regulations) as providing guidance as to what 'benefit' or 'specific future purpose' a superannuation fund should provide.

In view of the legislation and the decisions made in Scott and Mahony, the Commissioner's view is that for a fund to be classified as a superannuation fund, it must exclusively provide a narrow range of benefits that are characterised by some specific future purpose. That is, the payment of superannuation benefits upon retirement, invalidity or death of the individual or as specified under the SIS Act.

Therefore, in order for the lump sum payment from the overseas fund to be considered a payment from a foreign superannuation fund as defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997, it must also satisfy the requirements set out in subsection 295-95(2) of the ITAA 1997. This means that it should not be an Australian superannuation fund as defined in that subsection but must be a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund as discussed above.

Information available indicates that benefits in the foreign pension scheme are only payable upon retirement, incapacity and death and the foreign pension scheme therefore meets the definition of superannuation fund. In addition, it is clear the payer of the lump sum payment is established outside of Australia with its central management and control outside of Australia.

Therefore, on the basis of the information provided, the Commissioner considers the lump sum payment from the foreign pension scheme was from a foreign superannuation fund as defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Applicable fund earnings

You treated yourself as a resident of Australia for income tax purposes over 20 years ago, in your first income tax return, and received a lump sum payment from the foreign pension scheme in the 2012-13 income year. As this was more than six months after you became an Australian resident, section 305-70 applies to include any 'applicable fund earnings' in your assessable income.

The 'applicable fund earnings' are worked out under section 305-75. As mentioned earlier, subsection 305-75(3) applies where the person becomes an Australian resident after the start of the period to which the lump sum relates.

Subsection 305-75(3) of the ITAA 1997 states:

If you become an Australian resident after the start of the period to which the lump sum relates, the amount of your applicable fund earnings is the amount (not less than zero) worked out as follows:

(a) work out the total of the following amounts:

    (i) The amount in the fund that was vested in you just before the day (the start day) you first became an Australian resident during the period;

    (ii) the part of the payment that is attributable to contributions to the fund made by or in respect of you during the remainder of the period;

    (iii) the part of the payment (if any) that is attributable to amounts transferred into the fund from any other *foreign superannuation fund during the period;

(b) subtract that total amount from the amount in the fund that was vested in you when the lump sum was paid (before any deduction for *foreign tax);

(c) multiply the resulting amount by the proportion of the total days during the period when you were an Australian resident;

(d) add the total of all previously exempt fund earnings (if any) covered by subsections (5) and (6).

In short, you are assessed only on the income earned (the accretion) in respect of the lump sum payment. Any amounts representative of earnings during periods of non-residency, and transfers into the paying fund do not form part of the taxable amount when the overseas benefit is paid.

Foreign currency conversion

Subsection 960-50(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that an amount in a foreign currency is to be translated into Australian dollars (A$). For the purposes of section 305-70 of the ITAA 1997, the 'applicable fund earnings' should be calculated by:

    · converting the lump sum payment received from the foreign fund at the exchange rate applicable on the day of receipt to Australian dollars (item 11 of the table to subsection 960-50(6)) and;

    · deducting from this amount the Australian dollar equivalent of the payment vested in the overseas superannuation fund at the exchange rate applicable on the day immediately before the residency date (item 11A of the table to subsection 960-50(6)).

Amounts to be used in calculation

The value of the lump sum payment in the foreign pension scheme on the day before you became a resident of Australia is converted into Australian dollars at the exchange rate that applied on that day.

During 2012-13 income year, a lump sum payment was paid to yourself in the form of a lump sum, which was converted into Australian dollars by your financial institution at the exchange rate that applied on that day.

'The period' for the purposes of paragraph 305-75(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 commences on the day on which the person first became an Australian resident and ceases on the day the lump sum is paid. You were a resident for the whole of this period. Therefore, the Australian resident days and the total days are the same, and so the proportion to be used in the calculation is 1.

Calculation of the assessable amount of the payment from the UK pension scheme

In accordance with subsection 305-75 (3) of the ITAA 1997 the amounts determined at sub-paragraphs 305-75(3)(a)(i), (ii) and (iii) are added.

This total is then subtracted from the amount determined under paragraph 305-75(3)(b).

This figure is multiplied by the proportion of the total days determined under paragraph 305-75(3)(c):

To this figure we add the amounts determined under paragraph 305-75(3)(d).

The result of this calculation is positive, as the amount in Australian dollars, vested in you before you became a resident of Australia is lower than the actual amount of the lump sum payment received, in Australian dollars.

As the amount is greater than zero, part of the lump sum payment will be included as assessable 'applicable fund earnings' in your 2012-13 income year.