| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012578973787
Ruling
Subject: Legal expenses
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for legal expenses?
Answer
No
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 2013
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2012
Relevant facts and circumstances
You were retrenched from your full-time employment.
Your employer offered an Employment Termination Payment (ETP).
You engaged the services of a solicitor as you believed the amount offered by your employer was inadequate.
You did not have a contract of employment.
Your solicitor was successful in negotiating a larger payment verbally with your employer.
You incurred legal expenses.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income or are necessarily incurred in carrying on a business for the purpose of gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income, or a provision of the ITAA 1997 prevents it.
In determining whether a deduction for legal expenses is allowed, the nature of the expenditure must be considered. The nature or character of the legal expenses follows the advantage that is sought to be gained by incurring the expenses. If the advantage to be gained is of a capital nature, then the expenses incurred in gaining the advantage will also be of a capital nature.
Employment termination payments (ETP), which are considered to be capital payments, are subject to special tax treatment that may result in some or the entire amount being included in the taxpayer's assessable income. However the fact that a capital payment is specifically brought to account as assessable income will not change the nature of the payment. An amount that is capital in nature will remain capital notwithstanding that it is specifically included in the assessable income of the taxpayer.
Alternatively, the payment you accepted was for the full amount owed to you, whether for salary, wages or other remuneration, leave entitlements, payment in lieu of notice, severance pay, or anything else connected with the employment or cessation of the employment.
Even if your employer had treated this payment as an undissected lump sum, the payment would still have been capital and a deduction not allowable for the legal expenses.
As the legal expenses were incurred in gaining a capital sum, they will also be of a capital nature and are therefore not deductible.