Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012590465446

Ruling

Subject: Non-commercial losses

Question

Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to allow you to include any losses from your business activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 2013-14 to 2014-18 financial years?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2014

Year ended 30 June 2015

Year ended 30 June 2016

Year ended 30 June 2017

Year ended 30 June 2018

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2013

Relevant facts

You carry on a business. The business has been in operation since the 1990's.

The ownership structure of the business changed in the early 2010's.

You do not expect the business to make a tax profit until the 2018-19 financial year, notwithstanding that commercially the business is profitable in all of the years between 2014 and 2018.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2E)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 35-55(1)(c)

Reasons for decision

For the 2009-10 and later financial years, Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless:

· you meet the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests

· the exceptions apply

· the Commissioner exercises his discretion.

In your situation, you do not satisfy the income requirement (that is, your taxable income, reportable fringe benefits and reportable superannuation contributions but excluding your business losses, exceeds $250,000) and do not come under any of the exceptions. Your business losses are therefore subject to the deferral rule unless the Commissioner exercises his discretion.

The relevant discretion may be exercised for the financial year in question where:

· it is in the nature of your business activity that there will be a period before a tax profit can be produced

· there is an objective expectation your business activity will produce a tax profit within the commercially viable period for your industry.

Where an operator chooses to carry on the business activities in a manner that does not produce a tax profit within the period that is commercially viable for the industry concerned, paragraph 35-55(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997 may not be satisfied.

TR 2007/6 states that the 'lead time' discretion provided for by paragraph 35-55(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997 is available for a business activity if there is an initial period from when the activity commenced where the nature of the activity prevents a tax profit from being made.

TR 2007/6 does not support any view that the discretion should available where the failure to make a profit is for reasons other than the nature of the business, such as, a consequence of starting out small and needing to build up a client base, or business choices made by an individual that are not consistent with the ordinary or accepted practice in the industry concerned - such as the hours of operation, location, climate or soil conditions, or the level of debt funding.

The commercially viable period begins at the commencement of the activity. A restructure or change in the ownership structure of a business does not re-set the lead time, provided the business activity is being carried on is predominantly the same. For example, the purchase of a going concern does not re-set the 'lead time' of an activity.

An ownership restructure does not alter the requirement that a commercially viable period from the commencement of the activity must be used for the purpose of the Commissioner's discretion. It follows the Commissioner cannot exercise his discretion in your case because the objective commercially viable period has expired.