| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012606270602
Ruling
Subject: CGT - compensation
Question 1
Is the compensation amount payable to you under an agreement between yourself and another party assessable under the capital gains tax provisions?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ending 30 June 2014
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2013
Relevant facts and circumstances
Before you commenced a primary production activity on your land you sought advice from an industry professional on the best practices to conduct the activity and acted on that advice. However the activity did not proceed as expected.
A report was prepared for you for the purposes of legal proceedings against the industry professional. The purpose of the report was to provide an expert opinion on, amongst other things, the extent of damage done as a result of advice given by the industry professional. The report stated due to the significant damage the activity was a complete failure.
You settled this legal action where the industry professional agreed to pay you a sum un-dissected in full settlement of the claims you brought against them.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 6-10
Reasons for decision
Taxation Ruling TR 95/35 states at the following paragraphs;
6. If an amount of compensation is received by a taxpayer wholly in respect of permanent damage suffered to a post-CGT underlying asset of the taxpayer or for a permanent reduction in the value of a post-CGT underlying asset of the taxpayer, and there is no disposal of that underlying asset at the time of the receipt, we consider that the amount represents a recoupment of all or part of the total acquisition costs of the asset.
7. Accordingly, the total acquisition costs of the post-CGT asset should be reduced in terms of subsection 160ZH(11) by the amount of the compensation. No capital gain or loss arises in respect of that asset until the taxpayer actually disposes of the underlying asset. If, in the case of a post-CGT underlying asset, the compensation amount exceeds the total unindexed acquisition costs (including a deemed cost base) of the underlying asset, there are no CGT consequences in respect of the excess compensation amount.
TR 95/35 also explains at paragraph 3 that permanent damage does not mean everlasting damage, but refers to damage which will have permanent effect unless some action is taken to put it right.
In your circumstances the payment received relates to permanent damage to an underlying asset (the land). The compensation is treated as a recoupment of all or part of the acquisition cost of the asset. The cost base of the asset is reduced to the extent of the consideration and any gain or loss will crystallise at the later time when the asset is sold.