Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1012614736871

Ruling

Subject: Guard dog expenses

Question

Are you entitled to a deduction for the expenses relating to the maintenance of guard dogs?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2013

The scheme commences on

1 July 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

You run a business.

The business premises have no security installed.

You maintain two dogs to prevent theft and damage to assets held on business premises.

The dogs are kept at the business premises at all times.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Section 8-1

Reasons for decision

Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income, except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature.

Various decisions of the courts over the years have determined that there must be a nexus or connection between the outgoing and the assessable income so that the outgoing is incidental and relevant to the gaining of assessable income (Ronpibon Tin NL & Tongkah Compound NL v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 47; (1949) 8 ATD 431) and the expenditure must not be capital, private or domestic in nature.

There are limited circumstances where a deduction for the upkeep of a dog can be claimed. These involve a finding that the dog performs an integral part of the income producing activity and contributes to the production of that income.

In your case you use the dogs, which are kept at the business premises at all times, as guard dogs to prevent theft and damage to trucks in the truck yard. This can be viewed as an identifiable function of the business operated and therefore contributes to the production of assessable income.

You are entitled to a deduction for the maintenance of the guard dogs under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.