Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012641347293
Ruling
Subject: Franking credits
Question 1
Will the Trust be entitled to a refund of franking credits under section 67-25 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 if the trustee franks the liquidator's distribution?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2014
Year ended 30 June 2015
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2013
Relevant facts and circumstances
1. The Trust was established as a charitable trust and is endorsed for income tax exemption as a charity. Given the level of its income, the Trust has been able to make funding commitments to a number of charities so that they can plan and therefore optimise their own activities. The whole of the Trust income each year is used for distributions to charities.
2. The major asset of the Trust is shares in the Company. The Trust is the sole shareholder of the Company and since 2000, the directors of the Company have been employees of the trustee.
3. The Company holds a large portfolio of listed company shares and investments in managed funds and some other relatively minor investments, and its only activity is investing these assets in order to provide income by way of dividends to the trust. Predominantly all of the net income of the Company each year is distributed to the Trust by way of dividend.
4. Although the Company is a taxpayer, all of the income tax it pays is ultimately refunded in full to the Trust by way of franking credits attaching to the dividends paid by the Company to the Trust. Together therefore, the Trust and the Company maintain the tax neutrality called for by the charitable purposes they serve.
5. The articles of association of the Company provide that once there are no longer directors associated with X, then the Company should be placed in voluntary liquidation and the assets transferred to the Trust.
6. The trustee wish's to carry out this requirement as its duties as trustee also support the wind up. The process required here for tax neutrality is inefficient. It keeps the entities out-of-pocket for a significant period each year. The structure impedes management of a balanced investment portfolio due to realisation of any capital gains being distributed as income under the trust deed, thus diminishing the capital value of the Trust.
7. Since franking credit rebates are only available after year end upon application by the Trust each year, there is invariable a time lag between tax payments by the Company on its income and refunds to the trust of franking credits attaching to dividends paid by the Company. The money paid in tax is neither invested for nor distributed to charities during this period.
8. The tax payment and refund process necessary for tax neutrality creates an impediment to switching investments, and consequently the Company's portfolio of listed shares cannot be managed to best advantage. Capital gains tax payable by the Company on share sales can only be refunded upon distribution of the gains to the Trust by way of dividend. This means that the investment capital represented by the gains would need to be reinvested by the Trust in Company shares each time the portfolio is adjusted. This is a cumbersome and inefficient process and there have been questions raised as to whether the trust can treat these payments as income or capital for trust purposes, as all income needs to be distributed.
9. The Company has not been wound up due to concerns that the substantial capital gains tax payable on transfer of the investment portfolio from the Company to the Trust would, due to the inefficiencies of the tax payment and refund process described, substantially diminish the funds available for investment and disrupt the Trust's distribution commitments.
10. The Company is seeking to increase the amount of the Company's 2014 tax instalment in anticipation of the capital gains to be realised on transfer of the investment portfolio to the Trust, and to defer collection of the instalment until 30 June 2014. That will allow the capital gains realised on transfer of the portfolio to be distributed by way of liquidator's distribution to the Trust in the 2013/14 financial year as a frankable deemed dividend. The Trust will be in the position to claims the associated franking credit refund early in the new financial year.
11. The Company proposes to appoint a liquidator upon receipt of the requested ATO approval.
12. Without being able to structure the process as outlined, the investment portfolio will be substantially diminished to the disadvantage of the charitable trust and those charities relying on its distributions.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 50-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 50-B
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 67-25
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 207-115(2)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 207-20
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 207-117
Reasons for decision
Summary
Under section 67-25 of the ITAA 1997, the Trust will be entitled to a refund of franking credits that are attached to the liquidator's distribution.
Detailed reasoning
Under the general rule in section 207-20 of the ITAA 1997, an entity which receives a franked distribution is entitled to a tax offset for the income year in which the distribution is made. Holders who are entitled to a tax offset under Division 207, in respect of franking credits received, will also be subject to the refundable tax offset rules in Division 67, unless specifically excluded from the refundable tax offset rules under section 67-25.
The Trust is a corporate tax entity, which is not ordinarily entitled to a refund due to section 67-25(1C) of ITAA 1997. However, as an income tax exempt charity it qualifies as an exempt institution that is eligible for a refund under section 207-115(2). Section 67-25(1C)(a) therefore exempts the Trust from the section 67-25(1C) restriction.
The Trust qualifies as an exempt institution that is eligible for a refund under section 207-115(2) because:
• the Trust is a "registered charity" under the table in section 50-5 of ITAA 1997;
• the Trust is exempt from income tax under Subdivision 50-B following the Commissioner's endorsement of the Trust as a charitable entity; and
• the Trust satisfies the residency requirement in section 207-117 since it has a physical presence in Australia and incurs expenditure and pursues its objectives principally in Australia, and will have done so at all times during the 2013/14 income year.
The Trust will therefore be entitled to a refund of the franking credits that will be attached to the liquidator's distribution.