| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1012686652217
Ruling
Subject: Capital gains tax
Question and answer
Are you entitled to a main residence exemption on the sale of the vacant land?
No.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2014
The scheme commenced on:
1 July 2013
Relevant facts and circumstances
The deceased lived at the property in question since before 20 September 1985 until they moved into an aged care facility several years ago.
The dwelling the deceased lived in was demolished as some stage between when the deceased moved into an age care facility and the date of death.
The dwelling was not accidentally destroyed.
The property was sold after the deceased's death as vacant land.
Relevant legislative provisions:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-10
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-160
Reasons for decision
In its ordinary application, the main residence exemption in Subdivision 118-B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) can only apply to a CGT event that happens to a dwelling - see subsection 118-110(1) of the ITAA 1997.
The exemption extends to any capital gain or loss from land adjacent to a dwelling (of a maximum area of 2 hectares) if the land is used primarily for private or domestic purposes and the same CGT event happens to the land as the dwelling.
There is only one circumstance, outlined in section 118-160 of the ITAA 1997, where the main residence exemption can be chosen for a CGT event that happens to vacant land. This is where a CGT event happens to the vacant land after a dwelling on the land that was your main residence was accidentally destroyed.
The effect of making a choice under subsection 118-160(2) of the ITAA 1997 to apply the main residence exemption to the sale of vacant land is that the dwelling is taken to continue in existence as your main residence from the time when it is destroyed until your ownership of the land ends. If you make this choice you cannot treat another dwelling as your main residence during that period.
In your case the exemption under section 118-160 of the ITAA 1997 is not available as the dwelling was not accidently destroyed, but removed from the land after the owner moved into aged care and before the land was sold.